Article Text

PDF
The new European Society of Cardiology guidelines on myocardial revascularisation: an appraisal
  1. Sjoerd T Nauta,
  2. Marcia Gaspersz,
  3. Jaap W Deckers
  1. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr J W Deckers, Thoraxcentre, Room Bd-420, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 RD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; j.deckers{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

The latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on myocardial revascularisation are reviewed. The nearly 300 recommendations make it difficult to apply them in their totality. The authors would propose 20–30 recommendations per guideline based on sound clinical evidence. Also, the scope of the current guidelines is very wide as it includes topics already incorporated in other guidelines, such as strategies for pre-intervention diagnosis and imaging as well as on secondary prevention. Some recommendations in the new guidelines are sensible and will not be disputed. In particular, the encouragement of a balanced multidisciplinary decision process (the ‘heart team’) is welcome. Although coronary revascularisation in unstable high risk patients is well accepted, this is less the case for the low risk patient with chest pain. This issue is controversial and a balanced discussion of the pros and cons of percutaneous coronary intervention is missing. Despite convincing evidence indicating lack of benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion, this procedure is not discouraged. Lastly, most committee members were interventional cardiologists or cardiac surgeons. Guideline committees should be representative of the whole group of professionals as the interpretation of the evidence by specialists may be biased. There may be a role for procedure oriented guidelines but, in that case, the items at issue should remain confined to matters directly related to technical aspects of the procedure.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests JWD was a member of the ESC Committee on Practice Guidelines from 2002 to 2006, and was the review coordinator of the (previous) PCI guideline.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.