rss
Heart 98:1257 doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302187
  • PostScript
  • Correspondence

A comparison of ECG scores for area at risk

  1. John F Beltrame
  1. Discipline of Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor John Beltrame, Discipline of Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, c/o Ward 5B, TQEH, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville South, Adelaide, South Australia 5011, Australia; john.beltrame{at}adelaide.edu.au

To the Editor: Versteylen et al1 recently evaluated several area at risk (AAR) methods in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction using four physiological principles, and concluded that cardiac MRI methods outperform angiographic methods, which are better than ECG methods. However, this study used the antiquated Aldrich score, rather than the updated ECG index, described by Wilkins et al.2

The Aldrich score is based upon the extent of inferior ST elevation …

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Heart.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Heart. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.