Article Text

Non-invasive imaging
Positron emission tomography measurements of myocardial blood flow: assessing coronary circulatory function and clinical implications
  1. Heinrich R Schelbert
  1. Correspondence to Dr Heinrich R Schelbert, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, B2-085J CHS, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; hschelbert{at}

Statistics from

Regional myocardial blood flow can now be measured non-invasively with contrast echocardiography, CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET). Measurements with PET have advanced furthest; their accuracy and reproducibility are well established, they can be and are employed in the clinical setting, and they are useful for probing the coronary circulation in humans. The ability to quantify myocardial blood flow rather than to only qualitatively evaluate its relative distribution expands current diagnostic capabilities. Flow measurements offer a means for functionally delineating more accurately the extent and severity of coronary artery disease and, importantly, for probing and measuring microcirculatory reactivity as a component of coronary circulatory function that thus far has escaped non-invasive examinations. This article briefly addresses methodological aspects of PET measurements of myocardial blood flow, and then examines how observations made with this new measurement tool relate to coronary circulatory function and how these measurements can uncover disease related alterations.

Methodological aspects of flow measurements

Several positron emitting radiotracers are available for PET measurements of myocardial blood flow. Oxygen-15 labelled water (O-15 water) is considered the ‘ideal flow tracer’ because its uptake in myocardium increases linearly with flow. Yet, its physical properties limit its clinical use: the 122 s physical half-life necessitates close coordination of clinical studies with the cyclotron production of the radiotracer. Further, the freely diffusible radiolabelled water equilibrates with the water space of the myocardium but also with those of blood and adjacent anatomical structures. The resulting low myocardium-to-blood activity ratio images require corrections for blood pool activity, either through additional labelled blood pool imaging or by mathematically separating the myocardial from blood pool radiotracer activity. In the clinical setting, most laboratories therefore prefer nitrogen-13 labelled ammonia (N-13 ammonia) or rubidium-82 chloride (Rb-82). Both are administered intravenously and promptly accumulate in myocardium while rapidly clearing from blood. The resulting high signal-to-noise myocardial …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.