rss
Heart 98:631-636 doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300924
  • Sudden cardiac death
  • Original article

The clinical management of relatives of young sudden unexplained death victims; implantable defibrillators are rarely indicated

  1. Clifford J Garratt1,2
  1. 1Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  3. 3Department of Clinical Genetics, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Clifford J Garratt, Central Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9TL, UK; clifford.garratt{at}cmft.nhs.uk
  1. Contributors Professor CJG designed the study and was heavily involved in the writing of the manuscript. Dr JC was heavily involved in writing the manuscript. Ms NM, Ms NK, Ms LK-S, Dr KM and Professor WN were all involved in managing the patients and in review of the manuscript.

  • Accepted 24 February 2012

Abstract

Objective Following national guidance on management of sudden unexplained death (SUD) in the young, inherited cardiac conditions (ICC) clinics were established to identify and treat relatives thought to be at increased risk. Studies have examined diagnostic yield of these clinics but outcome of clinical management has not been reported.

Design Observational outcome study of consecutively referred relatives of SUD victims.

Setting Regional ICC clinic.

Patients 193 individuals (108 families) referred to a regional ICC clinic following SUD/aborted cardiac arrest of a young relative (mean follow-up 16.5 months, range 0.1–61).

Interventions All individuals underwent assessment by history, examination, ECG and echocardiography. Exercise electrocardiography, ajmaline provocation, further imaging techniques and genetic testing were performed in selected individuals. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion based on national guidelines.

Main outcome measures and results Forty-five patients (23%) from 38 families (35%) were diagnosed with an inheritable cause of sudden death. Eighteen had potentially prognostically important medication commenced and 4 had an ICD inserted on clinic recommendation (2 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 1 dilated cardiomyopathy, 1 arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy). Two other individuals had ICDs removed after negative testing for familial RYR2 mutations. No deaths have occurred during follow-up to date.

Conclusion A diagnosis of an inheritable cause of sudden death was obtained in a significant minority of those with a family history of SUD/aborted cardiac arrest. The number of ICDs inserted as a result of specialist assessment was very small (2%). A major function of the clinic is reassurance of the clinically normal and cessation of treatment after exclusion of familial disease by genetic testing.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Report of clinical outcomes, not a formal trial.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Heart.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Heart. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.