Article Text

PDF

GW23-e0458
EFFECT OF POSTCONDITIONING AND DELAYED POSTCONDITIONING ON ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CORONARY DISEASE DURING ISCHAEMIA-REPERFUSION
  1. Ma Xiao-jing1,
  2. Zhang Xing-hua1,
  3. Ma Hong-jun2,
  4. Ma Xiao-jing1
  1. 1Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University
  2. 2Shandong Provincial Academy of Medical Science

    Abstract

    Objectives Although successful restoration of blood flow is mandatory of salvage of ischaemic tissue, reperfusion can paradoxically place tissue of further injury. The aim of this study was to observe the effect of postconditioning and delayed postconditioning on endothelial function in elderly patients with coronary disease during forearm ischaemia reperfusion (IR).

    Methods Fifty-four elderly patients (average age: 66.44±5.49 years) with coronary disease were recruited in this study, and randomised to three groups, IR group, postconditioning group and delayed postconditioning group. Brachial artery endothelial function was assessed by ultrasound to measure flow-mediated dilation (FMD). FMD was measured before and after IR (20 min of arm ischaemia followed by 20 min of reperfusion). Postconditioning group were given postconditioning (three cycles of 30-s reperfusion followed by 30-s reocclusion) within 1 min of reperfusion, and the delayed postconditioning group were given the procedure more than 1 min after the onset of reperfusion.

    Results There were no significant difference between the three groups in age, sex, plasma lipid, smoking rate, morbidity of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The baseline arterial diameter and FMD before IR had no difference between the three groups (IR:3.84±0.66, postconditioning: 3.76±0.68, delayed postconditioning: 3.80±0.72, p<0.05). Flow-mediated dilation was reduced by IR in the three groups (IR: 8.37±2.76 vs 3.05±0.91, p<0.05; Postconditioning: 8.22±2.48 vs 6.70±2.36, p<0.05; Delayed postconditioning: 8.52±2.35 vs 3.17±1.04, p<0.05). FMD of Postconditioning group was much higher than that of the IR group (6.70±2.36 vs 3.05±0.91, p<0.05), while no protection was observed when the application of postconditioning was delayed for 1 min after the onset of reperfusion (3.17±1.04 vs 3.05±0.91, p>0.05).

    Conclusions Endothelial function was damaged by IR. Postconditioning applied within 1 min of reperfusion might protect against endothelial IR injury, while the protective effect disappeared when the postconditioning applied more than 1 min after the onset of reperfusion.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.