Article Text

PDF

065 OUT OF HOURS PRIMARY PCI IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED ADVERSE OUTCOMES COMPARED TO IN-HOUR PROCEDURES
  1. K S Rathod,
  2. D A Jones,
  3. D I Bromage,
  4. S M Gallagher,
  5. A Mathur,
  6. A K Jain,
  7. A Wragg,
  8. C Knight
  1. London Chest Hospital, Bartshealth NHS Trust

    Abstract

    Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the treatment of choice for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) provided PPCI is performed in a timely manner. There is conflicting data regarding the outcomes of patients treated in-hours versus out of-hours, we sought to determine whether in-hospital and long-term outcomes are different among in-hours versus out of hours PPCI patients.

    Table 1

    Methods This was an observational study of 3347 STEMI patients treated with PPCI between 2004 and 2012 at a single centre with follow-up for a median of 3.3 years (IQR range 1.2–4.6 years). The primary end-point was long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) with all cause mortality a secondary endpoint. Of these, 1299 patients (38.8%) underwent PPCI during a weekday between 08:00 and 18:00 (routine-hours group) and 2048 (61.2%) underwent PPCI on a weekday between 18:00 and 08:00 or a weekend (out-of-hours group).

    Results There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups with comparable door to balloon times (IHs 67.8 min vs OOHs 69.6 min, p=0.709) and procedural success (table 1). In hospital mortality rates were comparable between the two groups (IHs 3.6% vs OFHs 3.2%) with timing of presentation not predictive of outcome (HR 1.25 (95% CI 0.74 to 2.11). Over the follow-up period there were no significant differences in rates of mortality (IHs 7.4% vs OFHs 7.2%, p=0.44) or MACE (IHs 15.4% vs OFHs 14.1%, p=0.28) (figure 1) between the two groups. After adjustment for confounding variables using multivariate analysis, timing of presentation was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.04 95% CI 0.78 to 1.39).

    Conclusions This large registry study demonstrates that in a large volume, well-staffed centre, PPCI outside routine-working hours is safe with no difference in outcome compared with PPCI during routine-working hours.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.