Aim To evaluate if 3D echocardiography (3-DE) is similarly accurate and reproducible as cMR in estimating LV parameters in patients with and without wall motion abnormalities (WMA).
Methods 83 patients (33 with WMA) underwent 3-DE and cMR. 3-DE datasets were analysed using a semi-automatic contour detection algorithm. The accuracy of 3-DE was tested against cMR in the 2 groups of patients. All measurements were made twice by 2 different observers.
Results LV mass by 3-DE was similar to that obtained by cMR (149±42g vs. 148±45g, p=0.67), with small bias (1±28g) and excellent interobserver agreement (-2±31g vs. 4±26g). The 2 measurements were also highly correlated (r=0.94), irrespective of WMA. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes and ejection fraction by 3-DE and cMR were highly correlated (r=0.97, 0.98, 0.94, respectively). Yet, 3-DE underestimated cMR end-diastolic (167±68mL vs. 187±70mL, p<0.001) and end-systolic (88±56mL vs. 101±65mL, p<0.001) volumes, but yielded similar ejection fractions (50±14% vs. 50±16%, p=0.23).
Conclusion 3-DE permits accurate determination of LV mass and volumes irrespective of the presence or absence of WMA. LV parameters obtained by 3-DE are also as reproducible as those obtained by cMR. This suggests that 3-DE can be used to follow-up patients with LV hypertrophy and/or remodeling.
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
- Comparative Studies
- LV mass
- Real-Time 3D Echocardiography
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.