Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Diastolic filling pattern and left ventricular diameter predict response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy
  1. Rainer Gradaus (gradaus{at}uni-muenster.de)
  1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
    1. Verena Stuckenborg (vstucken{at}uni-muenster.de)
    1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
      1. Andreas Löher (andreas.loeher{at}ukmuenster.de)
      1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Germany
        1. Julia Köbe (koebeju{at}uni-muenster.de)
        1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
          1. Florian Reinke (reinke{at}ukmuenster.de)
          1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
            1. Stefan Gunia (gunia{at}ukmuenster.de)
            1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
              1. Christian Vahlhaus (vahlhaus{at}uni-muenster.de)
              1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
                1. Günter Breithardt (g.breithardt{at}uni-muenster.de)
                1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany
                  1. Christian Bruch (bruchc{at}uni-muenster.de)
                  1. University Hospital Munster, Department of Cardiology, Germany

                    Abstract

                    Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate predisposing factors for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.

                    Design Single center study.

                    Setting University hospital in Germany.

                    Patients 122 consecutive heart failure patients (65±11 years; ischemic/non-ischemic 41% / 55%; NYHA 3.1±0.3; LV-EF 22±7%; QRS-width 170±32 msec, QoL 43.5±19.2) with an indication for CRT and demonstrated left ventricular dyssynchrony by echocardiography including Tissue Doppler imaging.

                    Interventions Besides clinical parameters lab testing, ECG, echocardiography including Tissue Doppler imaging, invasive hemodynamics, parameters of quality-of-life and of exercise capacity were obtained before CRT implantation and during follow-up.

                    Main outcome measure Responders were predefined as improvement by one or more NYHA functional class or reduction of LV endsystolic volume by 10% or more during follow-up. Mean follow-up was 418 ± 350 days.

                    Results Overall, 70.5% of patients responded to CRT therapy. Responders had a significantly improved survival compared to non-responder (96.2% versus 45.5%, log-rank p<0.001). On univariate analysis, LV-EDD, LV-ESD, E/A ratio, a restrictive filling pattern, mean PA-pressure, PC-pressure, NT-proBNP, and VO2max were significant predictors of outcome. On multivariate analyses, LV-ESD (p=0.009; F=7.83), PC-pressure (p=0.015, F=6.61), and a restrictive filling pattern (p=0.026, F=5.707) remained significant predictors of response.

                    Conclusions Despite treatment according to present guidelines nearly 30% of patients had no benefit from CRT treatment in a clinical setting. On multivariate analyses, patients with an increased LV endsystolic diameter and concomitant diastolic dysfunction had a significantly worse outcome.

                    • cardiac resynchronization therapy
                    • left ventricular diastolic dysfunction
                    • prognosis

                    Statistics from Altmetric.com

                    Request permissions

                    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.