Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: one year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trial.
  1. Julie Redfern (julieredfern{at}dodo.com.au)
  1. ANZAC Research Institute, Concord Hospital, Australia
    1. Tom Briffa (tom.briffa{at}uwa.edu.au)
    1. University of Western Australia, Australia
      1. Elizabeth Ellis (elizabethellis{at}ozemail.com.au)
      1. University of Sydney, Australia
        1. Saul Ben Freedman (ben{at}med.usyd.edu.au)
        1. Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia

          Abstract

          Objective: To determine the effect of a novel CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) program on cardiovascular risk factors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors.

          Design: Single-blind randomised controlled trial.

          Setting: Tertiary referral hospital in Sydney Australia.

          Patients: 144 ACS survivors who were not accessing standard cardiac rehabilitation. Data was also collected on a further 64 ACS survivors attending standard cardiac rehabilitation.

          Intervention: CHOICE group (n=72) participated in a brief, patient-centered, modular program packaged as a clinic visit plus telephone support, encompassing mandatory cholesterol lowering and tailored preferential risk modification. Control group (n=72) participated in ongoing conventional care but no centrally coordinated secondary prevention.

          Main outcome measures: Values for total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking status and physical activity.

          Results: CHOICE and control groups were well-matched at baseline. At 12 months, the CHOICE group (n=67) had significantly better risk factor levels than controls (n=69) for total cholesterol (TC) (4.0±0.1 v 4.7±0.1mmol/L, p<0.001), systolic blood pressure (131.6±1.8 v 143.9±2.3mmHg, p<0.001), body mass index (28.9±0.7 v 31.2±0.7kg/m2, p=0.025) and physical activity (1369.1±167.2 v 715.1±103.5METS/kg/min, p=0.001) as well as better knowledge of risk factor targets. Also at one year, fewer CHOICE participants (21%) had three or more risk factors above widely recommended levels then controls (72%) (p<0.001).

          Conclusions: Participation in a brief CHOICE program significantly improved the modifiable risk profiles and risk factor knowledge of ACS survivors over 12 months. CHOICE is an effective alternative for addressing the widespread under-utilisation of existing secondary prevention programs [Current controlled trials ISRCTN42984084].

          Statistics from Altmetric.com

          Request permissions

          If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

          Linked Articles