Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Comparison of delayed enhancement patterns on multislice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocardial infarction
  1. Michel Habis (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
  1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
    1. Andre Capderou (capderou{at}ccml.fr)
    1. Univ Paris-Sud CNRS UMR 8162, France
      1. Anne Sigal-Cinqualbre (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
      1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
        1. Said Ghostine (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
        1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
          1. Saliha Rahal (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
          1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
            1. Jean Yves Riou (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
            1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
              1. Philippe Brenot (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
              1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
                1. Claude Yves Angel (mmchabis{at}free.fr)
                1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France
                  1. Jean François Paul (pauljf{at}ccml.fr)
                  1. Centre chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, France

                    Abstract

                    Objective: Recent experimental and limited clinical studies have demonstrated the usefulness of delayed enhancement multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for assessing myocardial infarct size (IS) and transmurality. The aim of this study is to compare MSCT enhancement patterns immediately after coronary angiography (CAG) in an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) setting with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) enhancement during the second week follow up.

                    Methods: Twenty six patients admitted for an AMI were evaluated by MSCT immediately after CAG without iodine re-injection. All but 3 were reperfused. The same patients had delayed enhancement CMR imaging at 10±4 day follow up. Myocardial enhancement was considered transmural (non-viable) when involving >75% of myocardial thickness, subendocardial (1 - ≤75%) or normal (viable for the two latter). Two or more >75% enhanced segments were required to define transmurality on patient or culprit artery level analysis. A semi-quantitative scale score was defined for the 17 left ventricular segments. IS was computed from these scores.

                    Results: On segment analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of MSCT for transmurality assessment were 84%, 96%, 94%, 85% and 96% respectively compared to CMR. On patient analysis, these respective values were 90%, 80%, 88%, 95% and 67%. IS assessed by the two methods were highly correlated (r=0.94, p<0.0001) and regression line did not statistically differ from identity line.

                    Conclusion: MSCT enhancement immediately following CAG without iodine reinjection for an AMI is a reliable method for evaluating transmurality and IS. This very early evaluation could be an interesting alternative to CMR.

                    Statistics from Altmetric.com

                    Request permissions

                    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.