Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Recurrent Falls: Pace Now or Wait for Another Fall? Editorial on HEARTJNL/2008/153189
  1. Cengiz Ermis (ermis001{at}umn.edu)
  1. Akdeniz University Medical Center, Turkey
    1. David G Benditt (bendi001{at}umn.edu)
    1. University of Minnesota Medical Center, United States

      Abstract

      In this issue of HEART, Parry et al (1) report results of a double-blind trial of pacing in elderly recurrent fallers with carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH). The so-called PERF-CSH trial utilized a cross-over design to determine whether dual-chamber cardiac pacing diminishes susceptibility to recurrent 'falls' in older CSH patients. Despite the encouraging findings with regard to pacing prevention of falls in the original SAFE-PACE findings, the current report indicates that pacing offers, at best, only marginal benefit. The outcome of PERF-CSH may seem to be a setback for our understanding of how to manage 'falls' in the elderly. However, the clinical problem that PERF-CSH addresses remains an important one, and the insight it provides will certainly prove valuable.

      Statistics from Altmetric.com

      Request permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

      Linked Articles