Article Text

other Versions

PDF
A comparison between B-type natriuretic peptide, global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score and their combination in ACS risk stratification
  1. Donald S C Ang (donaldscang{at}doctors.org.uk)
  1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
    1. Li Wei (l.wei{at}dundee.ac.uk)
    1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
      1. Michelle P C Kao (m.kao{at}dundee.ac.uk)
      1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
        1. Chim C Lang (c.c.lang{at}dundee.ac.uk)
        1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
          1. Allan D Struthers (a.d.struthers{at}dundee.ac.uk)
          1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom

            Abstract

            Background: In acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both the GRACE score and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) predict cardiovascular events. However, it is unknown how BNP compares with GRACE and how their combination performs in ACS.

            Methods: We recruited 449 consecutive ACS patients and measured admission GRACE score and bedside BNP levels. The main outcome measure was either all cause mortality, readmission with ACS or congestive heart failure (defined as a cardiovascular event) at 10 months from presentation.

            Results: Of the 449 patients, 120 patients presented with ST elevation MI (27%). There were 90 cardiovascular events at 10 months. Both higher GRACE terciles and higher BNP terciles predicted cardiovascular events. There was a significant but only partial correlation between the GRACE score and LOG BNP (R=0.552, P<0.001). On multivariate analyses, after adjusting for the GRACE score itself, increasing BNP terciles independently predicted cardiovascular events [second BNP tercile adjusted RR 2.28 (95% CI, 1.15-4.51) and third BNP tercile adjusted RR 4.91 (95% CI, 2.62-9.22)]. Patients with high GRACE score-high BNP were more likely to experience cardiovascular events at 10 months [RR 6.00 (95% CI, 2.40-14.83)] compared to those with high GRACE score-low BNP [RR 2.40 (95% CI, 0.76-7.56)].

            Conclusion: In ACS, most but not all of our analyses suggest that BNP can predict cardiovascular events over and above the GRACE score. The combined use of both the GRACE score and BNP can identify a subset of ACS patients at particularly high risk. This implies that both the GRACE score and BNP reflect somewhat different risk attributes when predicting adverse prognosis in ACS and their synergistic use can enhance risk stratification in ACS to a small but potentially useful extent.

            Statistics from Altmetric.com

            Request permissions

            If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.