Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Determination Using Real Time Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Adenosine Stress: Comparison With Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
  1. Sahar S Abdelmoneim
  1. Mayo Clinic, United States
    1. Abhijeet Dhoble
    1. Mayo Clinic, United States
      1. Mathieu Bernier
      1. Mayo Clinic, United States
        1. Stuart Moir
        1. Mayo Clinic, United States
          1. Mary E Hagen
          1. Mayo Clinic, United States
            1. Sue Ann C Ness
            1. Mayo Clinic, United States
              1. Samir S Abdel-Kader
              1. Assiut University, Egypt
                1. Patricia A Pellikka
                1. Mayo Clinic, United States
                  1. Sharon L Mulvagh (smulvagh{at}mayo.edu)
                  1. Mayo Clinic, United States

                    Abstract

                    Objective: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE)-derived absolute myocardial blood flow for detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with simultaneous technetium 99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

                    Design: Prospective study.

                    Setting: Tertiary-care medical institution.

                    Patients: Seventy-nine patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

                    Interventions: Simultaneous SPECT and real-time MCE during adenosine stress.

                    Main outcome measures: Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF, mL/min/g), microbubble velocity (β, min−1), and reserve values. End points included sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) or negative likelihood ratio (LR−), and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

                    Results: Reserve measurements were feasible in 975 of 1,343 segments (73%); of these, 130 segments (13%) were abnormal by SPECT. MCE perfusion parameters clearly distinguished abnormal from normal segments for β reserve (1.13±0.99 vs 2.22±1.36, P<.001) and MBF reserve (1.80±2.29 vs 3.69±2.79, P<.001). The β reserve cutoff of 1.60 provided the following: AUC, 0.787; sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 66%; LR+, 2.40; and LR−, 0.28. The MBF reserve cutoff of 1.90 provided the following: AUC, 0.779; sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 72%; LR+, 2.69; and LR−, 0.37. MBF reserve had an AUC of 0.773 for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 0.885 for the left circumflex coronary artery, and 0.739 for the right coronary artery.

                    Conclusions: Real-time MCE-derived absolute MBF, β, and reserve values are feasible and accurate for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities as defined by SPECT.

                    Statistics from Altmetric.com

                    Request permissions

                    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.