Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Selective Site Right Ventricular Pacing
  1. Khaled Albouaini (albouaini{at}gmail.com)
  1. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, United Kingdom
    1. Amr Alkarmi (amrkarmi{at}yahoo.com)
    1. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, United Kingdom
      1. Telal Mudawi (telal.mudawi{at}ctc.nhs.uk)
      1. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, United Kingdom
        1. Michael D Gammage (m.d.gammage{at}bham.ac.uk)
        1. University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
          1. David J Wright (jay.wright{at}ctc.nhs.uk)
          1. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, United Kingdom

            Abstract

            The right ventricular apex (RVA) has been the elective site for placing endocardial pacing leads since 1959 when Furman described the use of the transvenous route for pacemaker implantation. This site was used because it is easily accessible, readily identified, and associated with a stable position and reliable chronic pacing parameters. It was recognised however, that pacing from the RVA did not reproduce normal ventricular conduction or contraction. With the advent of reliable active fixation leads, alternative right ventricular sites became accessible and began to be explored. In this review, we will outline the detrimental effects of RVA pacing, define the right ventricular outflow tract, and discuss the evidence for selective site pacing.

            Statistics from Altmetric.com

            Request permissions

            If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.