Article Text

other Versions

PDF

Original article
Osteoprotegerin and cardiovascular mortality in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes
  1. Ragnhild Røysland1,2,
  2. Marc P Bonaca3,4,
  3. Torbjørn Omland1,2,
  4. Marc Sabatine3,4,
  5. Sabina A Murphy3,
  6. Benjamin M Scirica3,4,
  7. Mette Bjerre5,6,
  8. Allan Flyvbjerg5,6,
  9. Eugene Braunwald3,4,
  10. David A Morrow3,4
  1. 1Divison of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
  2. 2K.G. Jebsen Cardiac Research Centre and Centre for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  3. 3TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  4. 4Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  5. 5Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  6. 6The Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Professor T Omland, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 27, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway; torbjorn.omland{at}medisin.uio.no

Abstract

Objective To assess the relationship between osteoprotegerin (OPG) and cardiovascular death, and the pathobiological mechanisms contributing to the association, in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Design Prospective observational.

Setting Biomarker substudy of MERLIN-TIMI 36, a randomised, placebo controlled trial of ranolazine in non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS.

Patients 4463 patients with NSTE-ACS.

Interventions Ranolazine or placebo.

Main outcome measures Incidence of cardiovascular death (CV death); additionally, heart failure (HF), cardiac arrhythmias, inhospital ischaemia, severe recurrent ischaemia or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI).

Results During a median follow-up of 341 days, 208 patients died of cardiovascular causes. The OPG baseline concentration was strongly associated with both 30 day and 1 year incidence of CV death. After adjustment for conventional risk markers, OPG concentrations (log transformed) remained a significant predictor of CV death by 30 days (HR (95% CI) 2.32 (1.30 to 4.17); p=0.005) and by 1 year (HR 1.85 (1.33 to 2.59); p<0.001). Baseline levels of OPG were also an independent predictor of new or worsening HF at 30 days (HR 2.25 (1.38 to 3.69); p=0.001) and 1 year (HR 1.81 (1.26 to 2.58) p=0.001). By univariable analysis, higher OPG was associated with both early ischaemic and arrhythmic events. Although OPG levels were associated with recurrent MI within 12 months, this association was attenuated and no longer significant after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusions OPG is independently associated with 30 day and 1 year risk of cardiovascular mortality and HF development after NSTE-ACS. As no independent relationship between OPG levels and recurrent ischaemia or MI was observed, myocardial dysfunction may be a more important stimulus for OPG production than ischaemia in ACS.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

The biomarker osteoprotegerin (OPG) has been linked to coronary atherosclerosis, coronary plaque stability and inflammation.1–3 OPG is a member of the tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily and was first identified as a regulator of bone resorption.4 By binding the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), acting as a decoy receptor to competitively inhibit RANKL interaction with its receptor, RANK, OPG inhibits osteoclastogenesis. OPG is expressed in the vascular system in both endothelial and smooth muscle cells and is also present in atherosclerotic plaques and in early atherosclerotic lesions.5 Mice deficient in OPG develop severe osteoporosis as well as medial calcification of the aorta and renal arteries.6 In human studies, OPG levels have been associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as increasing age, decreased kidney function and duration of diabetes.7–9 It has also been associated with prevalence and severity of peripheral vascular disease10 and prognosis in cerebrovascular disease.11 In coronary artery disease (CAD), OPG has been found to be associated with the severity12 and number of coronary artery plaques.1 In addition, OPG levels are associated with coronary artery calcification on CT,1 as well as the risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the general population.13

OPG is inversely related to indices of left ventricular function in the general population14 and has been associated with the development and progression of heart failure. Accordingly, it has previously been shown that both experimental and clinical heart failure is associated with increased expression of the OPG/RANKL/RANK axis.15 Moreover, in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), OPG levels reflect final infarct size16 and predict outcome in patients presenting with post-infarction heart failure (HF).17 In a study of 897 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we have previously observed that OPG levels obtained early after admission for ACS were associated with long term all-cause mortality.18

To evaluate the relationship between OPG and cardiovascular outcomes and to further explore the underlying pathobiological mechanisms contributing to the prognostic value of OPG in ACS, we analysed baseline blood samples from 4463 participants in the MERLIN (Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischaemia in NSTE-ACS)-TIMI 36 trial, a large, well characterised, contemporary population of patients with non-ST elevation (NSTE)-ACS. In contrast with prior work, we investigated the association between OPG and cardiovascular mortality, and assessed whether the increased risk of death associated with higher levels of OPG could be attributed to one or more of the main determinants of mortality after ACS—that is, electrical instability, left ventricular dysfunction or recurrent ischaemia. Accordingly, we assessed associations between OPG and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, HF development and recurrent ischaemic events.

Methods

Study population

This is a substudy of the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial, and the design, entry criteria and main results have been previously described.19 20 In brief, the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial was a randomised, controlled, multicentre study of 6560 patients with NSTE-ACS treated with ranolazine or placebo. Eligible patients had at least 10 min of ischaemic symptoms at rest and presented with one of the following: elevated biomarkers of myonecrosis, ST segment depression ≥0.1 mV, a history of diabetes mellitus or an intermediate to high (≥3) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score. Exclusion criteria included persistent ST segment elevation, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, cardiogenic shock or a life expectancy <12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, AMI or recurrent ischaemia during the study period. The major safety endpoints were death from any cause and symptomatic documented arrhythmia.

In this biomarker substudy, we measured OPG levels at enrolment in all available plasma samples (n=4463). We investigated OPG with a primary interest in the risk of cardiovascular death. In addition, we examined the potential mechanisms of adverse cardiovascular outcomes by assessing recurrent ischaemia, MI or development of new or worsening HF during follow-up, as well as development of symptomatic documented arrhythmias on continuous ECG recordings from the first 7 days of follow-up. Endpoints were adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee. The protocol was approved by the relevant institutional review boards, and informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to study commencement.

Blood sampling procedures and biochemical assays

Samples of venous blood were obtained at randomisation in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid anticoagulated plastic tubes, and plasma was isolated within 60 min of sample acquisition. Plasma samples were stored in plastic cryovials at −20°C or colder at the enrolling site until shipped to the TIMI Biomarker Core Laboratory (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) where they were maintained at −80°C or colder. The samples were shipped to Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, for analysis.

Plasma levels of OPG were quantified by an inhouse time resolved immunofluorometric assay, using commercially available monoclonal antibodies (DY085E from R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK). The method has been described previously.21 The limit of detection was 15 ng/l. A plasma control was included in every OPG assay. The intra- and inter-assay variations (%) were below 5% and 9%, respectively, at concentration of 1000 ng/l. In a population based sample of 216 subjects (39% male, mean age 43 (SD 11) years) without a history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension or diabetes, the median OPG concentration was 1164 ng/l (5th percentile 733 ng/l, 95th percentile 2211 ng/l). C reactive protein (CRP) was measured by an established high sensitivity (hs) nephelometric method (Siemens). The assay range for hs-CRP was 0.05–10 mg/l, with a limit of detection of 0.03 mg/l and coefficient of variation of 5.1%, 2.2% and 2.5% at hs-CRP concentrations of 0.17, 1.16 and 1.88 mg/l, respectively. Levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were measured using the TnI ultra assay (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc, Deerfield, Illinois, USA) and B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured using the ADVIA Centaur (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc, Deerfield, Illinois, USA).

The assay for cTnI has a lower level of detection of 6 ng/l, a 99th percentile value of 40 ng/l and a total imprecision of 10% at a concentration of 30 ng/l.22 For BNP, the decision limit was 80 ng/l.23 24 The assay range for BNP was 0.5–5000 ng/l with a coefficient of variation of 3.4%, 2.9% and 2.4% at BNP concentrations of 48, 461 and 1768 ng/l, respectively. All biomarker testing was performed by personnel blinded to clinical outcomes and treatment allocation.

Statistical analysis

Plasma concentrations of OPG are reported using the median and IQR of values. Cut-offs for OPG categories correspond to the 33rd and 67th percentiles. Categorical baseline characteristics were compared using χ2 tests for categorical variables and are presented as proportions; continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of increased circulating OPG levels at baseline. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to assess associations between OPG levels and the outcome measures at the 30 day and 1 year follow-up periods.

Both unadjusted and covariate adjusted analyses were performed. In the covariate adjusted analysis, all elements of the TIMI risk score for NSTE-ACS, including cTnI ultra, as well as history of chronic HF, creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, gender, BMI, BNP and CRP were included. OPG was entered both as a continuous (log transformed) variable and as a categorical variable (ie, divided in tertiles). The discriminative value of adding OPG to a predefined risk model was evaluated by calculating the category-less net reclassification improvement.25

Analysis was performed using STATA V.10.1 (StataCorp). A p value (two tailed) <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Median time from onset of ischaemic symptoms to randomisation was 24 h (IQR 13–34 h). Median value of OPG was 1632 ng/l (IQR 1206–2242 ng/l), and cut-off levels between tertiles were 1345 ng/l and 2000 ng/l, respectively. There was a very weak, but statistically significant, association between time from symptom onset and OPG levels at baseline (r=0.03; p=0.022). Characteristics of the patients according to OPG tertile 3 versus tertiles 1 and 2 at baseline are shown in table 1. Patients with higher OPG levels were more likely to be older, to be female, to have an index diagnosis of NSTEMI, a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%, a BNP value >80 ng/l and a positive cTnI (table 2). A history of diabetes, hypertension, chronic HF and impaired renal function, expressed as estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, were more frequent in the highest versus the two lower OPG tertiles. In addition, in patients without known diabetes, a fasting glucose >7 mmol/l (126 mg/100 ml) or non-fasting glucose ≥11 mmol/l (200 mg/100 ml) was more frequent in the highest versus the two lower OPG tertiles (p=0.009). In contrast, a history of dyslipidaemia, a family history of CAD and to be a current smoker were more frequent in the two lower OPG tertiles. The frequency of prior angina, MI, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft did not differ between the third versus the first and second OPG tertiles. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, age ≥75 years, a history of diabetes and estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min were the variables most closely associated with higher baseline OPG levels (table 3).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Table 2

Osteoprotegerin and the severity of structural heart disease

Table 3

Independent predictors of higher circulating osteoprotegerin (tertile 3) at baseline

Relationship to cardiovascular death

During a median follow-up time of 341 days, 208 patients died of cardiovascular causes. The concentration of OPG at baseline was strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality at both 30 days and 1 year (figure 1). By univariable analysis, the HR associated with 1 SD increase in logarithmically transformed OPG levels at baseline was 4.67 (95% CI 2.85 to 7.67; p<0.001) at 30 days and 3.85 (95% CI 2.92 to 5.08; p<0.001) after 1 year (table 4). After adjustment for conventional risk markers, including TIMI risk score covariates, a history of chronic HF, creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, gender, BMI, BNP, CRP and OPG concentrations remained significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality after 30 days (HR (95% CI) 2.32 (1.30 to 4.17); p=0.005) and 1 year (HR 1.85 (1.33 to 2.59); p<0.001). Comparing the third versus the first and second tertiles yielded an adjusted HR of 2.14 (1.21 to 3.80; p=0.009) for cardiovascular mortality at 30 days and 1.78 (1.31 to 2.43; p<0.001) at 1 year. By net reclassification analysis, adding OPG tertile 3 versus tertiles 1 and 2 to a risk marker model including TIMI risk score covariates, BMI, BNP and CRP resulted in significantly improved reclassification of patients (p<0.0001).

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves of cardiovascular mortality by tertiles of osteoprotegerin (OPG) at baseline.

Table 4

Associations between osteoprotegerin concentrations (continuous) and events during follow-up

Exploratory univariable analyses were performed to assess the relationships between OPG and subcategories of cardiovascular death. OPG was associated with the incidence of sudden death (n=85, HR 2.19 (1.43 to 3.36)), the incidence of fatal HF secondary to coronary atherosclerotic disease (n=38, HR 7.20 (3.41 to 15.22)) as well as with the incidence of other coronary atherosclerotic deaths (n=113, HR 2.51 (1.73 to 3.63)).

Relationship to HF hospitalisation

One hundred seventy-seven patients were hospitalised for HF during the first year after ACS. By multivariable analysis, a 1 SD increase in logarithmically transformed OPG levels at baseline was associated with increased risk of HF hospitalisation (HR 1.81 (1.26 to 2.58) p=0.001) (table 4). Comparing the third versus the first and second tertiles yielded an HR of 3.04 (2.26 to 4.11; p=0.001) for HF hospitalisation. By multivariable analysis, OPG in the third tertile was associated with increased risk of hospitalisation for HF within 30 days (HR 1.77 (1.11 to 2.82); p=0.017) and 1 year (HR 1.70 (1.22 to 2.36); p=0.002). In a subgroup analysis of patients with BNP <80 ng/l, higher OPG levels were still significantly associated with hospitalisation for HF (p=0.0059). Adding OPG tertile 3 versus tertiles 1 and 2 to a risk marker model that included BNP and hs-CRP resulted in significantly improved reclassification of patients (p<0.0001).

Relation to coronary anatomy, inhospital ischaemia and inhospital cardiac arrhythmias

Among patients undergoing coronary angiography (n=2476), patients with elevated OPG were more likely to have multivessel (≥2) CAD and disease involving the left anterior descending artery (table 2). Within the first 7 days of follow-up, 892 patients had significant ischaemic events and 3413 patients had significant arrhythmia on Holter recordings. Both ischaemic and significant arrhythmic events were significantly more frequent in the upper OPG versus the two lower tertiles during the first 7 days of follow-up but these relationships were attenuated after adjustment for patient age. The number of patients with significant ventricular tachycardia (ie, ≥8 beats) did not differ according to OPG tertile.

Relationship to recurrent ischaemia and myocardial infarction at 30 days and 1 year

In contrast with the findings inhospital, the risk of experiencing recurrent ischaemia, defined as severe recurrent ischaemic events leading to hospitalisation or revascularization and worsening angina requiring intensification of medical therapy, at 30 days and 1 year was not associated with OPG levels. However, 86 patients in the first OPG tertile, 115 in the second and 135 patients in the third tertile experienced an AMI during the 12 months after the index event. Thus, by univariable analysis, OPG was associated with the 1 year incidence of recurrent MI (HR 1.67 (1.33 to 2.09); p=0.001). In a multivariable model, however, this association was attenuated and no longer significant (table 4).

Relationship with treatment allocation or ejection fraction determination

No interaction between OPG levels and treatment allocation was found. Moreover, for the endpoints of cardiovascular mortality or HF, no interaction was observed between OPG levels and access to left ventricular ejection fraction determination.

Discussion

In this large study of well characterised patients with NSTE-ACS, the main finding was that OPG is robustly and independently associated with the 30 day and 1 year risk of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation for HF. These associations translated into a significant reclassification of the risk of both cardiovascular death and HF hospitalisations. Although OPG was related to the angiographic severity of CAD and ischaemia on Holter recording during the first 7 days, no association with the incidence of recurrent AMI or of cardiac arrhythmias was observed after multivariable adjustment. These findings point towards additional mechanistic assessment that will help elucidate whether OPG related pathways are a potential therapeutic target in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.

Clinical and research implications

We have previously shown an association between OPG levels and all-cause mortality among 897 patients across the spectrum of ACS followed for 89 months.18 However, the pathobiological mechanisms underlying the association between OPG and mortality have remained elusive. Theoretically, OPG could reflect one or more of the following: atherosclerotic burden, myocardial ischaemia, arrhythmia risk or the degree of ventricular dysfunction. For instance, observations from epidemiological studies of the general population have suggested that OPG is independently associated with the extent of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis,1 myocardial anatomy and function,14 and the risk of atrial fibrillation.26 However, to what extent these mechanisms are operative and relevant to the association between OPG and survival in the setting of NSTE-ACS is unclear.

We have now demonstrated that OPG is independently and strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality both early after presentation (at 30 days) and in the longer term. In addition, our current large scale study, which prospectively collected data on coronary anatomy, myocardial ischaemia, cardiac arrhythmias and HF, has provided new insight relating these potential mechanisms to the association between OPG and cardiovascular mortality. The current data suggest that HF rather than myocardial ischaemia or cardiac arrhythmias is the principal factor explaining the increased risk of death associated with higher circulating OPG levels in the setting of NSTE-ACS. These findings extend previous observations in smaller studies of an association between OPG and long term risk of HF after ACS18 and between OPG and risk of mortality in patients with AMI complicated by HF,17 as well as of data demonstrating associations between OPG and final infarct size,16 and between OPG levels and mortality in patients with chronic HF.21 27 Moreover, our findings are compatible with experimental data showing that myocardial OPG gene expression and protein content are increased in HF,15 which suggests that OPG might play a role in left ventricular remodelling and the progression of HF.

We also observed an association between the extent of atherosclerosis on coronary angiography and OPG levels. However, as the extent of atherosclerosis is also associated with the degree of ventricular dysfunction, the extent of atherosclerosis could be an epiphenomenon or mediator of the association between OPG and ventricular dysfunction. In fact, controversy exists as to whether or not OPG is related to progression of atherosclerosis. Although some epidemiological data suggest that OPG is related to the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and calcifications,1 this finding has not been confirmed by others.13 Recent experimental data also suggest that OPG may play a protective role with regard to progression of atherosclerosis. For instance, mice genetically modified to not express OPG demonstrate accelerated advanced lesion progression,28 and in a mouse model, treatment with recombinant OPG was associated with stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques by promoting smooth muscle cell and collagen accumulation.3 In human studies, however, treatment with recombinant OPG has not been associated with altered risk of cardiovascular events.29 30

Patients with ACS, in particular in those complicated by left ventricular dysfunction or HF, are at increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Moreover, recent data have suggested that OPG is related to the development of new onset atrial fibrillation.26 We have previously shown that OPG levels are associated with mortality in patients with HF of both ischaemic and non-ischaemic origin,21 and we therefore hypothesised that part of the explanation for the association between OPG levels and increased risk of mortality after NSTE-ACS might be that OPG levels are associated with the risk of recurrent arrhythmic events. Although the number of patients experiencing significant arrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death increased with OPG concentration, this association was attenuated after multivariable adjustment.

Strength and limitations

The strengths of the current study include the large and well characterised contemporary cohort of NSTE-ACS patients. Study limitations include the fact that patients with suspected NSTE-ACS recruited in a clinical trial may not accurately reflect or be entirely generalisable to the broad unselected population of patients with acute chest pain. Although we found evidence of added value of OPG in risk reclassification for the endpoints cardiovascular death and HF, the clinical relevance of OPG will depend on whether or not therapeutic relevance is established.

Conclusion

OPG is robustly associated with 30 day and 1 year risk of cardiovascular mortality and HF development but not recurrent ischaemia or MI. These findings suggest that left ventricular dysfunction, rather than myocardial ischaemia, is the more important mediator of the adverse prognosis indicated by elevation of OPG in ACS. Our findings in this well characterised patient population add to the emerging evidence supporting involvement of OPG in the pathophysiology of ACS and its consequences, and support investigation of therapies that might modify this risk, including the elucidation of OPG related pathways that might be evaluated as targets for intervention.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Funding MERLIN-TIMI 36 was supported by CV Therapeutics (now Gilead Science Inc). The company had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

  • Competing interests TO has received speakers' honoraria and research support from Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Laboratories. MS has received grants for clinical research via the TIMI Study Group and Brigham and Women's Hospital from Nanosphere and served as a consultant for Singulex. SAM has received consultant fees from Amarin and Eli Lilly. BMS has received grants for clinical research via the TIMI Study Group and Brigham and Women's Hospital from CV Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Daiichi-Sankyo Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Bristol-Myers-Squibb Company, and has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CV Therapeutics, Cogentus, Shionogi and Co Ltd, Gilead Sciences Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Schering-Plough Corporation. DAM is an investigator and receives salary from the TIMI Study Group. He has received honoraria for educational presentations from Eli Lilly. He has received remuneration for consulting from Beckman-Coulter, Boehringher Ingelheim, Cardiokinetix, Critical Diagnostics, Gilead, Instrumentation Laboratory, Ikaria, Menarini, Merck, OrthoClinical Diagnostics, Servier, Roche Diagnostics and Siemens, and remuneration from AstraZeneca for adjudication as a member of a Clinical Events Committee. The TIMI Study Group has received research grant support from Accumetrics, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beckman Coulter, BG Medicine, BRAHMS, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CV Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd, Eli Lilly and Co, GlaxoSmithKline, Integrated Therapeutics, Merck and Co, Nanosphere, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Nuvelo, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Pfizer, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Siemens and Singulex.

  • Ethics approval The protocol was approved by the relevant institutional review boards at all participating centres.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles