Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Original article
Diagnostic performance and system delay using telemedicine for prehospital diagnosis in triaging and treatment of STEMI
  1. Martin Boehme Rasmussen1,2,
  2. Lars Frost1,
  3. Carsten Stengaard2,
  4. Jens Uffe Brorholt-Petersen3,
  5. Karen Kaae Dodt4,
  6. Hanne Maare Søndergaard5,
  7. Christian Juhl Terkelsen2
  1. 1Department of Medicine, Silkeborg Regional Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Centre Viborg and Silkeborg Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby, Aarhus N, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Medicine, Herning Regional Hospital, Herning, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Medicine, Regional Hospital Horsens, Horsens, Denmark
  5. 5Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Centre Viborg and Silkeborg Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Martin Boehme Rasmussen, Department of Medicine, Silkeborg Regional Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Centre Viborg and Silkeborg Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark; martin.b.rasmussen{at}dadlnet.dk

Abstract

Objective European ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines recommend prehospital diagnosis to facilitate early reperfusion in patients with STEMI, and they provide recommendations regarding optimal system delay (time from first medical contact (FMC) to the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)). There are limited data on achievable system delays in an optimal STEMI system of care using prehospital diagnosis to triage patients with STEMI directly to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres. We examined the proportion of tentative prehospital STEMI diagnoses established by telemedicine confirmed on hospital arrival, and we determined system delay in patients diagnosed before hospital arrival and triaged directly to the catheterisation laboratory.

Methods Design: Population-based follow-up study. Setting: Central Denmark Region. Participants: 15 992 patients diagnosed using telemedicine.

Results During the study period, a tentative diagnosis of STEMI was established in 1061 patients, of whom 919 were triaged directly to the PCI centre. In 771 (84%) patients, a diagnosis of STEMI was confirmed. Patients transported <10 km had a mean system delay of 82 min; this delay rose to 103 min for patients transported 50–75 km. Data on system delay was achievable in 682 patients in whom 553 (81%) were treated within 120 min of the FMC, and a system delay of <120 min was achievable in 89% of patients living up to 95 km from the PCI centre. Even for patients living <10 km from the PCI centre, only 16 (14%) had a system delay of 60 min or less.

Conclusions The use of telemedicine for prehospital diagnosis and triage of patients directly to the catheter laboratory is feasible and allows 89% of patients living up to 95 km from the invasive centre to be treated with PPCI within 120 min of the emergency medical service call. The study confirms that a recommendation of a system delay <60 min is unachievable if the FMC is the emergency medical call.

  • Electrocardiography
  • Triage/methods
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Coronary angiography
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.