Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Correspondence
Considerations on the poor discriminatory power of the FRANCE-2 risk score: Authors' reply
  1. Bernard Iung1,
  2. Cedric Laouenan2,
  3. Alec Vahanian1,
  4. Martine Gilard3
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France 
  2. 2Biostatistics Department, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France
  3. 3Department of Cardiology, Brest University, Brest, France
  1. Correspondence to Professor Bernard Iung, Department of Cardiology, Bichat Hospital, 46 rue Henri Huchard, Paris 75018, France; bernard.iung{at}bch.aphp.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The Authors’ reply, we thank Diaz et al1 for their positive comments on the methodology used to develop the FRANCE-2 transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) score.2 We also share their opinion that its discrimination limits the accurate identification of patients who are likely to die shortly after TAVI. This should, however, be balanced by the good calibration. We agree that ‘the creation of an efficient and reliable predictive model for TAVI seems to be of the biggest challenges’. Nevertheless, the means to reach this goal is …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles