Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Original article
Ambulance telephone triage using ‘NHS Pathways’ to identify adult cardiac arrest
  1. Charles D Deakin1,2,
  2. Simon England2,
  3. Debbie Diffey2
  1. 1NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
  2. 2South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Charles D Deakin, NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; charlesdeakin{at}doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Background UK ambulance services are called to 30 000 cardiac arrests (CAs) annually where resuscitation is attempted. Correct identification by the ambulance service trebles survival by facilitating bystander-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and immediate ambulance dispatch. Identification of CA by telephone is challenging and involves algorithms to identify key features. ‘NHS Pathways’ is now used for triage by six of 12 UK ambulance services, covering a population of 20 million. With the significant improvements in survival when CA is accurately identified, it is vital that ‘NHS Pathways’ is able to identify CA correctly.

Methods All ‘999’ emergency calls to South Central Ambulance Service (SCAS) over a 12-month period screened by NHS Pathways v9.04 were identified. All actual or presumed CAs identified by the emergency call taker were cross-referenced with the ambulance crew's Patient Report Form to identify all confirmed CAs.

Results A total of 469 400 emergency (999) calls were received by SCAS. Of the 3119 CA identified by ambulance crew, 753 were not initially classified as CA by NHS Pathways (24.1%). Overall, sensitivity=0.759 (95% CI 0.743 to 0.773); specificity=0.986 (95% CI 0.9858 to 0.98647); and positive predictive value=26.80% (95% CI 25.88 to 27.73%).

Conclusions NHS Pathways accurately identifies 75.9% of adult CAs. The remainder represents approximately 7500 treatable CAs in the UK annually where the diagnosis is missed, with significant implications for patient outcome. Further work is required to improve this first link in the chain of survival.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors The study was conceived by CDD. All authors agreed the protocol and had access to all the anonymised data or had the opportunity to review all aggregate data during analysis. All authors had input to writing and reviewing the manuscript. CDD is the guarantor.

  • Competing interests CDD is the Resuscitation Council (UK) representative on the NHS Pathways National Clinical Governance Group and Divisional Medical Director for South Central Ambulance Service NHS Trust. DD is the NHS Pathways lead in South Central Ambulance Service NHS Trust.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement All data obtained in this study are presented in the manuscript.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.