Reversibility of hypotension and shock by atrial or atrioventricular sequential pacing in patients with right ventricular infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(84)90537-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Hypotension and shock associated with heart block and other forms of atrioventricular (AV) dissociation frequently accompany right ventricular infarction (RVI). Such patients do not invariably improve with ventricular pacing. We evaluated the relative effects of AV dissociated rhythms (ventricular pacing or nodal rhythm) and AV synchronous rhythms (atrial pacing, AV sequential pacing, or return to normal sinus rhythm) in seven patients with RVI complicated by AV dissociation, who had hypotension or shock. Hemodynamic monitoring demonstrated the characteristic features of RVI in all patients. Restoration of AV synchrony resulted in a highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) increase in systolic blood pressure (88.0 ± 16.5 mm Hg to 133.0 ± 21.8 mm Hg), cardiac output (3.8 ± 0.9 L/min to 5.7 ± 0.9 L/min), and stroke volume (40.5 ± 6.9 cc to 61.0 ± 10.0 cc). We conclude that restoration of normal AV synchrony has a marked effect on stroke volume in this setting and that atrial or AV pacing can reverse hypotension and shock in RVI complicated by AV dissociation.

References (25)

  • AC Tans et al.

    Clinical setting and prognosis significance of high-degree atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction: A study of 144 patients

    Am Heart J

    (1980)
  • WB Wartmen et al.

    The incidence of heart disease in 2,000 consecutive autopsies

    Ann Intern Med

    (1948)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Right ventricular infarction

      2018, Cardiac Intensive Care
    • Right ventricular infarction

      2018, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although atropine may restore physiologic rhythm in some patients, temporary pacing is often required. Ventricular pacing alone may suffice, especially if the bradyarrhythmias are intermittent and atrioventricular sequential pacing may be necessary for increasing the cardiac output and reversing the shock associated with atrioventricular dyssynchrony in RVI [64]. However, transvenous pacing can be difficult because of issues with ventricular sensing, presumably related to diminished generation of endomyocardial potentials in the ischemic RV.

    • ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

      2012, Cardiovascular Therapeutics: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease: Fourth Edition
    • Is Right Ventricular Failure Common in the Intensive Care Unit How Should It Be Managed?

      2010, Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care: Expert Consult: Online and Print
    • Right ventricular infarction

      2010, Cardiac Intensive Care: Expert Consult
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text