Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(90)90970-CGet rights and content

Abstract

Measurement of coronary artery stenosis is an invaluable tool in the study of coronary artery disease. Clinical trials and even day-to-day decision making should ideally be based on accurate and reproducible quantitative methods. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) using digital angiographic techniques has been shown to fulfill these requirements. Yet many laboratories have abandoned visual analysis in favor of the intermediate quantitative approach involving hand-held calipers. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the relation between QCA and the commonly used caliper measurements. Percent stenosis was assessed in 155 lesions using 3 techniques: QCA, caliper measures from a 35-mm cine viewer (cine) and caliper measures from a video display (CRT). Good overall correlation was noted among the 3 different techniques (r >-0.72). Both of the caliper methods underestimated QCA for stenosis ≥75% (p ≤0.001) and overestimated stenosis <75% (p < 0.05). Reproducibility assessed in 52 lesions by independent observers showed QCA to be superior (r = 0.95) to either of the caliper measurements (cine: r = 0.63; CRT: r = 0.73). Therefore, the commonly used caliper method is not an adequate substitute for QCA because overestimation of noncritical stenoses and underestimation of severe stenoses may occur and the measurements have poor reproducibility. These factors definitely preclude its use in rigorous clinical trials. Moreover, since they do not appear to overcome known deficiencies of visual analysis, caliper measurements for day-to-day clinical use must also be seriously questioned.

References (30)

  • EN Arnett et al.

    Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings

    Ann Intern Med

    (1979)
  • CM Grondin et al.

    Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization

    Circulation

    (1974)
  • HG Kemp et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy of selective coronary cinearteriography

    Circulation

    (1967)
  • GBJ Mancini et al.

    Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method

    Circulation

    (1987)
  • GBJ Mancini

    Quantitative coronary arteriography: development of methods, limitations, and clinical applications

    Am J Cardiac Imaging

    (1988)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Sex differences in assessing stenosis severity between physician visual assessment and quantitative coronary angiography

      2022, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the limitation of PVA is high inter- and intra-observer variability in estimating stenosis severity. In contrast, quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), a computer-assisted technique, is objective with high reproducibility [6]. Differences between observer assessment of stenosis severity by PVA versus QCA have been reported to range from 15% to 45% [7–10].

    • Computerized technologies informing cardiac catheterization and guiding coronary intervention

      2021, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) has evolved as the dominant automated approach for reproducible quantification of lesion severity in coronary arteries. QCA superseded earlier efforts including manual segmentation and electronic calipers by leveraging automated edge detection algorithms to identify the contrast-enhanced lumen on cineangiography and is more accurate and reproducible than expert analysts in assessing lumen stenosis.1,2 Several QCA systems are currently available and have found extensive use in recent years in estimating lumen dimensions and planning treatment, as well as in research to examine the efficacy of novel therapeutic strategies and stent platforms.

    • Chest pain in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: A critical review of current concepts focusing on sex specificity, microcirculatory function, and clinical implications

      2019, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most objective and accurate assessments, however, may be obtained by computer assisted systems with automated edge detection, so-called ‘quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)’, which has become the standard in current clinical investigations [48]. Compared with state of the art QCA systems visual assessments and caliper measurements tend to overestimate lesions causing <70% lumen diameter reduction [49–51]. Since usually a cutoff of 50% diameter reduction is used to separate obstructive from non-obstructive lesions it is unlikely that visual or caliper assessments have led to a significant number of false classifications as non-obstructive disease.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text