Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 147, Issue 6, June 2004, Pages 1100-1105
American Heart Journal

Clinical investigations: imaging and diagnostic testing
Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography

Presented in part at the 51st Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology, March 17–20, 2002, Atlanta, Ga.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

No previous studies have compared myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with a medium likelihood of CAD. This study was developed to test the hypothesis that MCE is superior to SPECT for the detection of CAD.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with a medium probability of CAD and no previous myocardial infarction were recruited. Results of MCE and SPECT were compared to quantitative coronary arteriography, where CAD was defined as >50% stenosis. Each patient was examined for the anterior and posterior circulations.

Results

On a coronary circulation basis (n = 110), the sensitivity of MCE was significantly greater than that of SPECT for the detection of CAD (86% vs 43%, P < .0001). However, the specificities were similar (88% and 93%, P = .52). Both techniques were marginally more accurate in the anterior compared to the posterior circulation (88% vs 76%, P = .07 for MCE and 79% vs 63%, P = .19, for SPECT). On a patient basis (n = 55), MCE had a higher sensitivity than SPECT for the detection of CAD (83% vs 49%, P < .05). Although specificity tended to be higher for SPECT than MCE (92% vs 58%), it was not significant (P = .33). When CAD was defined as >40% coronary stenosis, the specificity of MCE increased to 83% without any change in sensitivity.

Conclusion

In this preliminary study, MCE was found to be superior to SPECT during dipyridamole stress for the diagnosis of CAD in patients with a medium pretest probability of CAD. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Section snippets

Methods

Patient population and protocol

Adults with chest pain but without a history of prior myocardial infarction or resting regional dysfunction on echocardiography who were scheduled for diagnostic coronary angiography were recruited for this study from 3 centers in Europe. Exclusion criteria included previous coronary artery bypass surgery, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and contraindications for dipyridamole administration. Patients were subjected to an analysis based

Results

A total of 55 patients with complete coronary angiographic data were recruited. The clinical characteristics of these patients and results of quantitative coronary angiography are listed in Table I. The pretest probability for this group of having CAD was 64% ± 26% (95% CI 57% –71%). For the assessment of perfusion, 110 coronary territories (equal number of anterior and posterior) were analyzed. Of these, 50 had CAD and 60 did not. Twelve patients had no CAD, while only 11 had multivessel CAD.

Discussion

This is the first study to examine the efficacy of both MCE and SPECT during dipyridamole stress in a patient population with medium probability of CAD who had no prior myocardial infarction or regional dysfunction on rest echocardiography. This is also the first study comparing both methods to quantitative coronary angiography. We found MCE to have a higher sensitivity than SPECT for the diagnosis of CAD on a patient as well as vascular territory basis. Although on a patient basis the

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (82)

  • Long-Term Association of Dipyridamole Stress Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

    2018, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several previous studies have indicated that stress MCE is more sensitive than SPECT for the detection of CAD.4,13,14,20 Three multicenter studies in which the results of MCE, SPECT, and coronary angiography were read blindly in core laboratories confirmed the superior sensitivity of MCE compared with SPECT for the detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.4,13,14 The lower specificity of MCE compared with SPECT for the detection of CAD may be explained by the higher prevalence of myocardial microvascular dysfunction in the patient population in which cardiovascular risk factors are highly prevalent.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by a grant from Amersham Health, Amersham, UK, and in part by grants (RO1-HL48890 and RO1-HL66034) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

View full text