Clinical InvestigationElectrophysiologyRate control versus rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation with mild to moderate heart failure: Results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study
Section snippets
Study design
In the RACE study, 522 patients with persistent AF were included from June 1, 1998, until July 1, 2001. In the present study, only patients with CHF in NYHA functional classes II and III at inclusion were selected from the original population. A total of 261 patients were analyzed with 130 and 131 patients randomized to rate- and rhythm-control groups, respectively.
A detailed description of the RACE design was recently published.3, 16 In short, rate control was achieved using negative
Patient characteristics
A total of 261 patients with AF in NYHA functional classes II and III for CHF were included in this study (Table I). Except for slightly more patients with hypertension in the rhythm-control strategy, no other significant differences in clinical characteristics between the groups were present.
Treatment
After a mean follow-up of 2.3 ± 0.6 years, 47 (36%) patients in the rhythm-control group were in sinus rhythm. Use of antiarrhythmic drugs and cardioversions were comparable to the main study. In the
Discussion
The present study shows that in patients with AF and mild CHF the occurrence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is comparable between those treated with rate control and those treated with rhythm control. However, we observed an important difference in the type of end points between both groups. There was a trend for a higher mortality and major bleedings under rate control. In addition, rhythm control was associated with excellent survival if sinus rhythm could be maintained. Of note,
References (31)
- et al.
Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation—Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation. The Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy
Am J Cardiol
(2003) - et al.
Time course of hemodynamic changes and improvement of exercise tolerance after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation unassociated with cardiac valve disease
Am J Cardiol
(1993) - et al.
Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output
Am J Cardiol
(1996) - et al.
Left ventricular dysfunction due to atrial fibrillation in patients initially believed to have idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Am J Cardiol
(1992) - et al.
Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1992) - et al.
Is rhythm control superior to rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure?
Am J Cardiol
(2004) - et al.
Effect of rate or rhythm control on quality of life in persistent atrial fibrillation. Results from the Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion (RACE) study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2004) - et al.
Prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in patients at a tertiary medical center referred for heart transplantation because of severe heart failure
Am J Cardiol
(1999)