Original Articles
Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by Doppler echocardiography: Clinical application of the Canadian consensus guidelines

https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2002.124877Get rights and content

Abstract

We evaluated diastolic filling patterns using Doppler echocardiography in 520 consecutive patients referred to our laboratory for transthoracic echocardiograms retrospectively and applied the standard guidelines used to characterize left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. Patients were classified by the Canadian consensus guidelines using transmitral and pulmonary venous Doppler echocardiographic parameters to have normal diastolic function or mild (abnormal relaxation), mild-to-moderate, moderate (pseudonormal), or severe (restrictive) diastolic dysfunction. LV diastolic dysfunction was present in 290 (56%) patients, whereas 167 (45%) patients with a normal LV ejection fraction had abnormal diastolic function. Patients with progressively more abnormal diastolic patterns had greater structural abnormalities with larger left atrial and LV size and lower LV ejection fractions. In the subset of patients with clinical evidence of congestive heart failure (99 patients), the prevalence of primary diastolic heart failure was 38% and most patients had underlying coronary or hypertensive heart disease. Standard guidelines of Doppler echocardiographic parameters allow semiquantitation of diastolic function and can be applied to studying large number of patients in a large clinical practice. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:1237-44.)

Section snippets

Study population

All data was evaluated retrospectively. The study group consisted of 520 consecutive patients referred to our laboratory for transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. Patients with severe mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral valve prosthesis or repair, pericardial tamponade, and constriction were excluded because unique hemodynamics in those patients affect the transmitral and pulmonary venous flow patterns. Likewise, patients with atrial fibrillation, rapid heart rate (>120 bpm),

Results

The mean age of patients was 62 ± 15 years with a range of 20 to 92 years. There were 326 men (63%) and 194 women (37%). The reasons for referral for the echocardiogram included coronary artery disease (27%); valvular disease (26%); heart failure (25%); hypertension (8%); and other miscellaneous indications (14%). The transmitral flow velocity pattern was recorded in all patients and an interpretable complete profile (including systolic, diastolic, and atrial reversal waves of pulmonary venous

Discussion

The noninvasive echocardiographic assessment of LV diastolic function has been attempted using Doppler echocardiographic indices of transmitral and pulmonary venous flow.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 These patterns have been used not only for diagnostic purposes but also for establishing prognosis and evaluating the effect of therapeutic interventions.19, 20, 21, 22 There is an increasing desire to measure echocardiographic indices of LV diastolic function routinely in conditions in which it can affect patient

Conclusion

LV diastolic dysfunction was present in 56% of 520 patients who were referred to transthoracic echocardiography using the Canadian consensus guidelines. In these patients, mild and moderate dysfunction were equally common and mild-to-moderate dysfunction was least common. Using these standard criteria, characterization of Doppler echocardiographic parameters of transmitral flow and pulmonary venous flow velocity pattern allows semiquantification of diastolic dysfunction. This integrated

References (35)

Cited by (55)

  • The Year in Perioperative Echocardiography: Selected Highlights from 2018

    2019, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    The application of standard echocardiography assessments of diastolic dysfunction (eg, mitral annulus tissue Doppler velocities, mitral inflow velocities, pulmonary venous flows) are frequently equivocal in the perioperative period because of rapidly changing loading conditions, vascular tone fluctuations, mechanical ventilation, and direct surgical impact (eg, pneumoperitoneum).55 Application of the American Society of Echocardiography criteria using the aforementioned standard diastology assessment tools has led to inconclusive determinations in 12% to 28% of examinations.56,57 Does LV strain assessment then have a role in the evaluation of diastolic function?

  • Plasma pro-b-type natriuretic peptide testing as a screening method for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    2012, Journal of Cardiac Failure
    Citation Excerpt :

    The studies were performed with Acuson equipment model Sequoia 512 (Mountainview, CA) 2.5- to 3.5-MHz transducers. According to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian consensus for diastolic dysfunction reports,11,12 the following parameters were measured in 3 cardiac cycles and averaged: Left atrial diameter, LV diastolic internal diameter, LV systolic internal diameter, LV systolic shortening (ΔD%), interventricular septal diastolic thickness, and LV posterior wall diastolic thickness.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Reprint requests: Allan L. Klein, MD, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine/F15, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 (E-mail: [email protected]).

View full text