Table 1

Incidence of AF after CABG in trials of prophylactic pacing

StudynIncidence of postoperative AFp Value
ControlRAPLAPBAP
*86% isolated CABG;†88% isolated CABG;‡RAP compared with control, LAP, and BAP;§85% isolated CABG;¶90% isolated CABG;**BAP compared with control, RAP and LAP;††Bachmann’s bundle pacing.
BAP, biatrial pacing; LAP, left atrial pacing; NS, not significant; RAP, right atrial pacing.
Kurz 19991421*22.2%50%
Greenberg 200015154†37.5%8%20%26%0.002‡
Daoud 200016118§28%32%10%0.02
Gerstenfeld 200117118¶35%21%0.08
Schweikert 1998188634%34%1.0
Blommaert 2000199627%10%0.036
Chung 20002010028.6%27.5%0.90
Orr 19982112029.5%18.2%NS
Levy 20002213038.5%13.8%0.001
Gerstenfeld 1999236133%29%37%>0.7
Neumann 2001249032%31%16%0.31
Fan 20002513241.9%33.3%36.4%12.5%<0.05**
Goette 20022616142%48%37%††NS