Table 2

Dual-phase MDCT and CCA results and comparisons (n = 107)

MDCTCCA
Coronary artery anatomy
    Coronary dominanceκ = 0.930
        right/left/co-dominance71/12/2471/12/24
    LAD terminatingκ = 0.930
        Before apex/reaching apex/wrappi ng around apex and supplying inferiorapical segment11/42/5411/43/52
Number of diseased vesselκ = 0.801
    Single-vessel disease6667
    Two-vessel disease2930
    Three-vessel disease1210
IRA/culprit lesion site**
    LM11
    LAD: proximal/middle/distal/diagonal19/25/3/219/25/3/2
    LCX: proximal/middle/distal/obtuse marginal6/10/8/36/10/8/3
    RCA: Proximal/middle/distal7/16/77/16/7
    Culprit lesion measurements
    Residual diameter stenosis (%)82 (18)80 (20.3)r = 0.85
        <40%/40–70%/>70–90%/>90–99%/100%8/20/27/23/298/23/26/23/27
    Plaque length (mm)16.1(10.2)14.8 (11.1)r = 0.81
    Plaque area (mm2)23.8 (7.2)
    Plaque density (HU)36.5 (14.2)
Extent of jeopardised/infarcted segments6.2 (2.2)6.1 (2.2)r = 0.95
    Extent of infarcted myocardium (%)36.7 (32.7)
    Extent of jeopardised myocardium (%)63.3 (34.8)
  • Data are presented as number or mean (SD). Agreement was presented by kappa value (κ). Correlation was presented by correlation coefficient (r).

  • *IRA/culprit lesion site: see text regarding if MDCT or CCA alone was insufficiency to identify it, how to confirm them by other modalities.

  • CCA, conventional coronary angiography; DE, delayed enhancement; HU, Hounsfield unit; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX, left circumflex; LM, left main coronary artery ; MDCT, multi-detector computed tomography; RCA, right coronary artery.