Table 1

Baseline characteristics of included studies

Bassiouny et al15Bernard et al23Haines et al16Ichiki et al24Kaseno et al17Kim et al18Lakkireddy et al9Maddox et al.19Mendoza et al25Nin et al20Pavaci et al26Rowley et al27Snipelisky et al21Yamaji et al22
Source typeJournal articleConference abstractJournal articleConference abstractJournal articleJournal articleJournal articleJournal articleConference abstractJournal articleConference abstractConference abstractJournal articleJournal article
Study designProspective, monocentric registryRetrospectiveMulticentric, retrospective, case-match analysisProspective, non-randomisedRetrospectiveRetrospectiveMulticentric, prospective, non-randomisedRetrospectiveRetrospectiveProspective, randomisedRetrospective, case-match analysisRetrospectiveRetrospectiveRetrospective, non-randomised and randomised*
Paroxysmal AF57% D
55% W
46% D
50% W
53% D
48% W
53%83% D
55% W
53% D
48% W
57% D
57% W
63% D
57% W
NA76% D
71% W
NANA68% D
46% W
65% D
62% W
Age58.6 D
62.7 W
62.7 D
67.3 W
60.2 D
59.7 W
n.s.59 D
62 W
61 D
61 W
60.4 D
60.3 W
62.3 D
62.5 W
62.9 D
64.0 W
61 D
61 W
NA
Case-matched
63±10
similar
60.6 D
64.6 W
60 D
61 W
♀ Gender25% D
26.6% W
NA26% D
31% W
NA25% D
21% W
20% D
26% W
21% D
21% W
24% D
33% W
10% D
12% W
16% D
20% W
NA
Case-matched
NA19.4% D
25.6% W
25% D
24% W
Estimated thrombo-embolic riskCHADS2
Score=0
42.6% D
29.1% W
Score=1
37.0% D
41.6% W
Score ≥2
20.5% D
29.4% W
CHA2DS2-VASc
2.00 D
2.68 W

CHA2DS2-VASc
1.6±1.3 D
1.9±1.4 W
Values NA
ns differences between treatment groups
CHADS2
Score=0
61% D 45% W
Score=1
31%D 41% W
Score ≥2
8% D 14% W
CHA2DS2-VASc
1.6±1.3 D
1.7±1.3 W
CHADS2
Score=0
35% D 40% W
Score=1
43% D 41% W
Score ≥2
23% D 19% W
CHA2DS2-VASc
1.6±1.4 D
1.5±1.3 W
CHADS2
0.92±0.88 D
0.92±0.85 W
CHA2DS2-VASc
1.73±1.45 D
1.69±1.33 W

CHADS2
1.32 D
1.29 W
CHADS2
Score ≤1
82% D 80% W
Score=1
11% D 13% W
Score ≥2
4% D 11% W
NACHADS2
1.3±1
CHADS2
0.80 D
1.16 W
CHADS2
Score=0
36% D 33% W
Score=1
40% D 38% W
Score ≥2
24% D 29% W
CHA2DS2-VASc
1.8±1.6 D
1.7±1.6 W
Estimated bleeding riskNANANANAHAS-BLED
0.5±0.7 D
0.6±0.6 W
HAS-BLED
1.0±0.9 D
1.1±0.9 W
HAS-BLED
1.2±0.9 D
1.1±0.9 W
NAHAS-BLED
1.47 D
1.63 W
NANANANANA
LV ejection fraction55% D
55% W
60% D
58% W
56% D
57% W
NA64% D
63% W
58% D
57% W
56% D
56% W
53% D
54% W
NA61% D
62% W
NANANA60% D
60% W
CKD/kidney functionCreat
0.9 mg/dL D
0.9 mg/dL W
Creat
1.0 mg/dL D
1.3 mg/dL W
Creat clearance
93 ml/min D
93 ml/min W
NACreat clearance
97 ml/min D
98 ml/min W
Creat
0.9 mg/dL D
0.9 mg/dLW
CKD
1% D
2% W
Creat
1.0 mg/dL D
1.1 mg/dL W
NACreat
0.9 mg/dL D
0.9 mg/dL W
NANANAExclusion of patients with renal clearance
< 30 mL/min
  • The first 291 patients were assigned to interrupted and non-interrupted warfarin in a non-randomised fashion and the last 212 patients were randomised to either uninterrupted warfarin or dabigatran.

  • AF, atrial fibrillation; CKD, chronic kidney disease; Creat, creatinine; D, dabigatran; LV, left ventricle; NA, not available; W, warfarin.