Table 3

Comparison between ejection fraction (EF) obtained by radionuclide angiography and by three echocardiographic methods in the hypertrophy group (n = 16)

EF by radionuclide angiography (%)EF by Teichholz’s formula (%)EF by mitral ring motion × 5 (%)EF by Simpson’s
rule (%)
Mean (SD)66.8 (6.8)73.5  (10.0)53.9  ( 12.9)67.3  (10.7)
Difference from EF by radionuclide angiography+6.7 ( 7.3)−12.9 (13.9)+0.5 (9.0)
Level of significance of differencep = 0.002p = 0.002NS
Correlation to EF by radionuclide angiography r= 0.69 r = 0.11 r = 0.55
Level of significance of correlationp = 0.003NSp = 0.028
Limits of agreement
(mean difference ±2 SD)
−8.7 and 22.3−17.6 and 18.6