Table 2

Perfusion abnormalities assessed by SPECT imaging in patients with severe (group A) and mild (group B) worsening of regional function during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Perfusion variablesGroup A (n = 37)Group B (n = 110)p Value
Number of stress perfusion defects3.8 (1.5)2.8 (1.5)0.0009
Number of rest perfusion defects3.0 (2.0)2.0 (1.6)0.001
Number of reversible perfusion defects1.4 (1.3)1.5 (1.4)0.8
Stress defect score8.5 (4.6)6.8 (4.1) 0.05
Rest defect score5.5 (3.8)3.9 (3.3)0.01
Reversible defect score3.0 (2.5)2.9 (2.7)0.9
Regional defect score (rest)2-150 1.40 (0.9)1.01 (0.8)0.04
Regional defect score (stress)2-150 2.41 (1.3)2.03 (1.5)0.03
Regional defect score (ischaemia)2-150 1.01 (0.8)1.02 (0.7)0.9
  • Values are mean (SD). Data are derived using a 6 segment/4 grade score model.

  • 2-150 Data derived on segmental basis in myocardial regions with ischaemia at echocardiography matched with the corresponding regions at SPECT using the 6 segment model.