Table 3

Comparison between patients with and without infarct related coronary artery occlusion

Mild stenosis, 50–59% (n=11) Moderate stenosis, 60–69% (n=21)Severe stenosis, 70–99% (n=17)Occluded artery (n=20)
DSE
Wall motion score index at rest1.29 (0.12)1.35 (0.16)1.46 (0.13)1.47 (0.22)
Sustained improvement6 (55%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (5%)
Biphasic response1 (9%)18 (86%)12 (71%)6 (30%)
Worsening in adjacent area0 (0%)3 (14%)4 (24%)10 (50%)
Akinesis without change4 (36%)0 (0%)1 (6%)3 (15%)
Residual ischaemia1 (9%)21 (100%)16 (94%)16 (80%)
Mibi SPECT, rest
Mean severity (%)32 (8)28 (14)38 (11)38 (11)
Defect surface (%)27 (18)25 (22)42 (23)43 (22)
Hypoperfusion index (%)7 (5)9 (11)18 (14)18 (11)
Index difference8 (13)6 (5)4 (3)5 (2)
Residual ischaemia8 (73%)17 (81%)11 (65%)12 (60%)
  • Values are mean (SD) or n (%).

  • DSE, dobutamine stress echocardiography; mibi SPECT,

  • 99mTc sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography.