Review
Clinical and pathologic features of postinfarction cardiac rupture

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(69)90240-9Get rights and content

Abstract

In a 15 year period 106 instances of myocardial rupture after myocardial infarction were observed at autopsy, an incidence of 8.6 per cent of fatal acute myocardial infarcts. This complication occurred most frequently in the seventh and eighth decades and was slightly more common in women. Clinically, rupture occurred most frequently during the first week after infarction. Historical evidence of previous coronary artery disease was uncommon. Hypertension had been present in 70 percent of the patients, but it persisted after the infarct in less than a third.

Pathogenetic factors were sought in the clinical aspects of the patients. No definite role could be ascribed to anticoagulant or sympathomimetic drugs or digitalis. Physical activity after infarction may be a predisposing factor in some instances. Sudden death without antecedent change in symptoms most often occurred. Cardiac tamponade or vascular collapse was documented in a few instances prior to death. In most instances no physical findings, laboratory tests, or electrocardiographic features that indicated cardiac rupture could be ascertained.

Based on histologie data, 90 per cent of the ruptures occurred during the first two weeks after infarction, at an average time of five days; 22 per cent were in the first 24 hours, and 69 per cent were in the first week. All of the infarcts were transmural and involved large areas of the left ventricle. Ruptures presented as distinct tears (79 per cent) or large areas of hemorrhagic dissection (9 per cent), or both (12 per cent). The most common site of rupture was through the anterior wall of the left ventricle; commonly, ruptures were near the septum or near the base of papillary muscle. The areas of rupture were more common in the basal two thirds of the ventricle than in the apical portion. The ruptures varied greatly in size. Most were situated within the area of infarction rather than at the junction between the infarcted and the normal myocardium. Unusual accumulations of polymorphonuclear leukocytes were not found in most specimens. Most hearts had severe coronary artery disease, but myocardial scarring was present in only a fourth. Cardiac hypertrophy was usually present. The amount of hemopericardium varied widely and was the apparent mechanism responsible for death in some patients.

Mural hemorrhage, hypertension, degree of polymorphonuclear infiltration, degree of myocardial fibrosis and location of the infarct may all be of pathogenetic significance in post-infarction rupture in different situations, but these considerations did not have universal applicability. The only common morphologic features among the infarcts that ruptured were their large size and transmural extent. The major pathogenetic considerations probably are loss of tensile strength of the infarcted segment, increased tension in this area, and, in some cases, divergent vector forces.

References (56)

  • F.R. Nuzum

    Auscultatory evidence of cardiac rupture

    Am. Heart J.

    (1950)
  • J.S. Robb et al.

    The normal heart: Anatomy and physiology of the structural units

    Am. Heart J.

    (1942)
  • R.M. Kohn

    Mechanical factors in cardiac rupture (Edit.)

    Am. J. Cardiol.

    (1959)
  • G.K. Mallory et al.

    The speed of healing of myocardial infarction: A study of the pathologic anatomy in seventy-two cases

    Am. Heart J.

    (1939)
  • Baggenstoss, A. H. Personal...
  • Edwards, J. E. Personal...
  • H.A. Salzmann

    Spontaneous rupture of the heart simulating surgical abdominal disease

    Am. J. M. Sc.

    (1934)
  • G.A.C. Snyder

    Spontaneous rupture of heart: Report of nine cases

    Northwest Med.

    (1940)
  • H.A. Edmundson et al.

    Hypertension and cardiac rupture: A clinical and pathologic study of seventy-two cases, in thirteen of which rupture of the interventricular septum occurred

    Am. Heart J.

    (1942)
  • S. Friedman et al.

    Rupture of the heart in myocardial infarction: Experience in a large general hospital

    Ann. Int. Med.

    (1944)
  • L. Foster

    Spontaneous rupture of the heart: A clinical-pathological correlation with the presentation of twelve cases

    Quart. Bull. Northwestern Univ. M. School

    (1946)
  • A.A. Lombardi

    Non-traumatic Cardiac Rupture: A Clincial-Pathologic Study

  • R.W. Oblath et al.

    Factors influencing rupture of the heart after myocardial infarction

    J.A.M.A.

    (1952)
  • B.R. Waldron et al.

    Myocardial rupture and hemopericardium associated with anticoagulant therapy: A post-mortem study

    New England J. Med.

    (1954)
  • J.F. Maher et al.

    Rupture of the heart after myocardial infarction

    New England J. Med.

    (1956)
  • F.D. Zeman et al.

    Cardiac rupture complicating myocardial infarction in the aged

    Arch. Int. Med.

    (1960)
  • R.M. Ross et al.

    Clinical and necropsy findings in rupture of the myocardium: A review of forty-three cases

    Scottish M. J.

    (1963)
  • T.A. Reyman

    Factors in cardiac rupture

    Harper Hosp. Bull.

    (1963)
  • Cited by (154)

    • Biomechanics of infarcted left Ventricle-A review of experiments

      2020, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    • Diagnostic accuracy of a novel ‘winking coronary angiographic sign’ in patients presenting with ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction

      2018, Indian Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is an uncommon but potentially lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Its prompt recognition is essential to permit timely institution of corrective measures.1–7 However, post-MI VSRs are often missed initially, due to a variety of reasons.

    • Effect of thrombolytic therapy on the patterns of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture

      2017, Indian Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The GUSTO investigators analysis of mortality within one day of thrombolytic therapy, however, shows that deaths within four hours of treatment were not influenced by the establishment of arterial patency, that patients were more likely to have severe cardiac dysfunction and larger infarcts.21 Patients, who develop a post myocardial infarction VSR, although unlikely to die this early, are also more likely to have an occluded artery and larger infarct.3,8,15,20,22,23 Thus it is likely that in patients who develop an early post Myocardial infarction VSR thrombolytic therapy is unlikely to salvage already necrosed myocardium and have little influence on the incidence or time of development of early VSRs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text