Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)91317-3Get rights and content

Abstract

A 2-part prospective study was performed to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with hemodynamically confirmed asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis (AS). During phase 1, linear regression analysis showed continuous wave Doppler to be highly accurate in predicting catheterization measured peak systolic aortic valve pressure gradients in 101 consecutive patients aged 36 to 83 years (mean 65 ± 8) with symptomatic AS. During phase 2, 90 additional patients (51 asymptomatic and 39 symptomatic) with Doppler-derived peak systolic aortic valve gradients ≥50 mm Hg (range 50 to 132 [mean 68 ± 19]) were followed for 1 to 45 months. Both groups of patients in phase 2 had similar Doppler gradients and clinical and auscuitatory evidence of moderate to severe AS at baseline. Asymptomatic patients were younger (p = 0.01), had higher ejection fractions (p = 0.001) and were less likely to have an electrocardiographic strain pattern (p = 0.01) and left atrial enlargement (p = 0.02). End-diastolic wall thickness, left ventricular cross-sectional myocardial area and estimated left ventricular mass were 18% (p = 0.0001), 20% (p = 0.0008), and 29% (p = 0.002) greater in symptomatic patients. During 17 ± 9 months of follow-up, 21 asymptomatic patients (41%) became symptomatic. Dyspnea was the most common initial complaint, occurring 2.5 and 4.8 times more often than angina and syncope, respectively. Compared with the 39 symptomatic patients, the 51 asymptomatic patients had a lower cumulative life table incidence of death from any cause (p = 0.002), and from cardiac causes (p = 0.0001) including sudden death (p = 0.013). Only 2 of the 51 initially asymptomatic patients (3.9%) died of cardiac cause during follow-up; in both, death was preceded by the development of angina pectoris or congestive heart failure. It is concluded that asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe AS have a good prognosis during their “latent” period and are at low risk for cardiac or sudden death. These data indicate that asymptomatic patients with AS can be followed medically as long as they remain free of symptoms.

References (39)

  • JA Magovern et al.

    Aortic valve replacement and combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting: predicting high risk groups

    JACC

    (1987)
  • I Gallo et al.

    Five to eight year follow-up of patients with the Hancock cardiac prosthesis

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1983)
  • J Ross

    Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy

    JACC

    (1985)
  • RL Feldman et al.

    Influence of aortic stenosis on the hemodynamic importance of coronary artery narrowing in dogs without left ventricular hypertrophy

    Am J Cardiol

    (1983)
  • RP Croke et al.

    Reversal of advanced left ventricular dysfunction following aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (1977)
  • S Munoz et al.

    Influence of surgery on the natural history of rheumatic mitral and aortic valve disease

    Am J Cardiol

    (1975)
  • RT Grant

    After histories for 10 years of a thousand men suffering from heart disease: a study in prognosis

    Heart

    (1933)
  • AW Contrato et al.

    Aortic stenosis with special reference to angina pectoris and syncope

    Ann Intern Med

    (1937)
  • J Bergeron et al.

    Aortic stenosis—clinical manifestations and course of the disease—review of 100 proved cases

    Arch Intern Med

    (1954)
  • Cited by (251)

    • The roadmap to transcatheter aortic valve implantation

      2023, Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
    • The AVATAR Trial for Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: Wait or Operate?

      2022, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text