Brief report
Possible atrial proarrhythmic effects of class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(90)90856-VGet rights and content

Abstract

The class IC antiarrhythmic drugs encainide and flecainide have been used to treat ventricular arrhythmias.1,2 Although not currently approved, they are also being used in the treatment of atria1 arrhythmias.3,4 This antiarrhythmic action results from a marked depressant effect on conduction velocity and a moderate effect on prolonging refractoriness in the myocardium.5,6 This marked depression of conduction velocity also results in the highest incidence of ventricular proarrhythmic effects observed with any class of antiarrhythmic drug.7,8 However, less is known regarding their potential to produce atria1 proarrhythmic effects.3,4 Recently we observed 6 patients who were being treated with flecainide or encainide for preexisting ventricular or atria1 arrhythmias, and who developed new or modified symptomatic atria1 arrhythmias with a rapid ventricular response. In 2 cases, life-threatening consequences arose from the arrhythmia. The clinical details of these cases are presented and the potential mechanisms of the atria1 proarrhythmic effects of the 1C drugs are discussed.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (146)

  • Drug Therapy in Adult Congenital Heart Disease

    2017, Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although they have minimal effect on the action potential duration, they cause marked conduction slowing, resulting in electrical heterogeneity and proarrhythmia, with consequent development of ventricular arrhythmias and increased mortality when they are used in patients with structurally abnormal hearts. Similarly, slowing of conduction can organize atrial fibrillation into a slow atrial flutter20 (which can potentially conduct in a 1:1 ratio to the ventricle) and hence AV nodal blocking agents should always be used with class IC agents. These agents are predominantly used in the treatment of atrial arrhythmias, but are also effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias when the benefits outweigh their proarrhythmic risks.

  • Flecainide-induced incessant orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: Uneven depression of accessory pathway conduction

    2016, HeartRhythm Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    A similar proarrhythmic effect has not been described with antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with an AP. In fact, the literature only describes the proarrhythmic effect of flecainide causing atrial flutter or ventricular tachycardia,5,6 but not the development of incessant supraventricular tachycardia in subjects with an AP. In the present report we describe a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome due to a right paraseptal AP in whom the administration of flecainide resulted in an incessant form of AVRT resembling the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia.

  • 1:1 atrial-flutter. Prevalence and clinical characteristics

    2013, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is however not possible to reproduce the same 1:1 conduction obtained during 1: 1 atrial flutter by atrial pacing [14,17]. The role of antiarrhythmic drugs has also been previously reported [19–21] mainly with class I antiarrhythmic drugs and this factor was also noted in the present study. The ventricular response during atrial flutter is determined by the refractory period of the AV node, the degree of concealed conduction within the AV node, and the level of autonomic tone.

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias

    2010, Brocklehurst's Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology
  • Aggravation of Arrhythmia by Antiarrhythmic Drugs (Proarrhythmia)

    2010, Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    As a result of this, among other factors, including blockade of multiple ionic channels (as discussed in “Risk factors for arrhythmia aggravation” in the section on electrocardiographic changes), amiodarone and dronedarone do not generally produce torsade des pointes.40–44 Although antiarrhythmic drugs may provoke new ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients being treated for a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, this form of arrhythmia aggravation should be distinguished from drug-induced rate-related aberration of ventricular conduction or prolongation of the QRS complex duration during a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (see Fig. 4).45–47 In this situation the wide complex tachycardia may be confused with a new ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was done during the tenure of Clinician Scientist Award 88 414 from the American Heart Association to Dr. Chen.

1

Dr. Fleck was a Fellow in Cardiac Electrophysiology at the University of California at San Diego Medical Center, from Balboa Naval Hospital, San Diego, California.

View full text