Original article: Cardiovascular
Determinants of early and late results of combined valve operations and coronary artery bypass grafting

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00970-1Get rights and content

Background.

Factors determining the outcome of operative correction of valvular abnormalities combined with coronary artery bypass grafting are still incompletely defined.

Methods.

Determinants of early and late (more than 90 days) deaths and event-free survival were studied for combined valve operations and coronary artery bypass grafting in 741 patients using multivariate analysis.

Results.

Ninety-day survival probability was 89% (95% confidence interval, 87% to 92%). Preoperative risk factors for early death were age, female sex, renal failure, New York Heart Association class IV or V, and mitral insufficiency. The operative risk factor was the duration of aortic cross-clamping. Five- and 10-year survival probabilities were 74% (95% confidence interval, 71% to 78%) and 43% (95% confidence interval, 36% to 50%), respectively. Preoperative risk factors for late death were age, preoperative renal failure, New York Heart Association class IV or V, vessel disease, and nonsinus rhythm. Five- and 10-year event-free survival probabilities were 57% (95% confidence interval, 53% to 61%) and 23% (95% confidence interval, 17% to 28%), respectively. Preoperative risk factors for non—event-free survival were age, female sex, reduced left ventricular function, mitral regurgitation, and pacemaker rhythm.

Conclusion.

The demographic factors of age and female sex; the comorbid condition of renal failure; the cardiac conditions of advanced New York Heart Association class, left ventricular function, mitral regurgitation, vessel disease, and cardiac rhythm; and the operative condition of ischemia time are the most important predictors of clinical outcome after combined valve operations and coronary artery bypass grafting.

References (30)

  • RichardsonJV et al.

    Combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization: results in 220 patients

    Circulation

    (1979)
  • SthleE et al.

    Early results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary bypass grafting

    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1991)
  • FlamengW et al.

    Combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery: early and late results

    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

    (1994)
  • ChenCC et al.

    Nucleoside transport inhibition mediates lidoflazine-induced cardioprotection during intermittent aortic cross-clamping

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1992)
  • LeightonRF et al.

    Detection of hypokinesis by a quantitative analysis of left ventricular cineangiograms

    Circulation

    (1974)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Effect of Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation Following Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair: Long-Term Analysis of Competing Outcomes

      2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As the authors reported, “This is equivalent to almost one-third of all patients developing significant recurrent MR by 20 years.” Despite this, the excellent results of this world-class master technician’s repair experience have been difficult to match by others to date (14,23,24). The predictors of MR recurrence in our large multisurgeon series were strikingly similar.

    • Outcome of patients aged ≥80 years undergoing combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 studies

      2012, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, prolonged cross-clamping time is known to negatively affect the short-term outcome after adult cardiac surgery because of the related myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and the systemic inflammatory effect of prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time.56,57 Very elderly patients are particularly exposed to intraoperative myocardial ischemia,58 and the benefit of reduced exposure to ischemic insult might be especially evident in those undergoing combined AVR and CABG.59 Interestingly, the herein included series reported mean cross-clamping time ranging from 6225 to 96 minutes13; therefore, there are potentials for decreasing the duration of myocardial ischemia.

    • Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes

      2011, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      These possible complications of the TAV technology justify the search for an alternative technique to safely replace the aortic valve in high-risk candidates for open surgery. We know from previous studies that the duration of aortic crossclamping and CPB are independent predictors of survival after valve replacement and combined valve operations with CABG.7 Therefore, a technology focused on shortening aortic crossclamp time and consequently CPB time is mandatory.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text