Myocardial infarction—Case studies of ethics in the consent situation
References (3)
Pastoral Psychology
(1972)et al.Clinical Investigation in Medicine: Legal, Ethical and Moral Aspects
(1963)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (17)
Attitudes and considerations of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction toward participation in randomized clinical trials
2019, American Heart JournalCitation Excerpt :Taken together, this was interpreted as sufficient, as patients simultaneously felt that they had the opportunity to ask additional questions during the decision-making process. In previous studies, rates of understanding the information provided on RCTs to make a good decision have been reported to range from 52% to 88%.6,9,10,12-17 In contrast, the corresponding rate in nonemergency cardiovascular RCTs has been reported to be as high as 90%.26
Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: A Danish study
2004, Social Science and MedicineIs informed consent to clinical trials an "upside selective" process in acute coronary syndromes?
2000, American Heart JournalPatients acceptance and comprehension to written and verbal consent (PAC–VC)
2023, BMC Medical EthicsPatients Acceptance and Comprehension to Written and Verbal Consent (PAC-VC)
2021, Research Square
- ∗
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Third International Conference on Social Science and Medicine (Elsinore August 1972).
Copyright © 1974 Published by Elsevier Ltd.