Myocardial infarction—Case studies of ethics in the consent situation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90125-5Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (3)

  • J.C. Fletcher

    Pastoral Psychology

    (1972)
    I. Ladimer et al.

    Clinical Investigation in Medicine: Legal, Ethical and Moral Aspects

    (1963)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • Attitudes and considerations of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction toward participation in randomized clinical trials

    2019, American Heart Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    Taken together, this was interpreted as sufficient, as patients simultaneously felt that they had the opportunity to ask additional questions during the decision-making process. In previous studies, rates of understanding the information provided on RCTs to make a good decision have been reported to range from 52% to 88%.6,9,10,12-17 In contrast, the corresponding rate in nonemergency cardiovascular RCTs has been reported to be as high as 90%.26

View all citing articles on Scopus

This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Third International Conference on Social Science and Medicine (Elsinore August 1972).

View full text