Original study
Physical work capacity with rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) versus dual chamber pacing (DDD) in patients with normal and diminished left ventricular function

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5273(95)02308-JGet rights and content

Abstract

To determine the benefit of atrial contribution on work capacity in relation to left ventricular ejection fraction, we studied 17 patients (68 ± 13 years) with dual chamber pacemakers (DDD) implanted for high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. In random order they were assigned to rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) and to atrial triggered ventricular (VDD) stimulation. Maximum oxygen uptake (max Vo2), that correlates best with work capacity, was measured by spiroergometry at a respiratory quotient of 1.1 during treadmill exercise test. Left ventricular ejection fraction at rest was determined by radionuclide ventriculography during VDD-stimulation and an AV delay of 150 ms. There were no differences between these two pacing modes relating heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation, exercise duration and maximal work load. In eight patients with an ejection fraction >50% (60 ± 10%), but not in nine patients with an ejection fraction <50% (41 ± 10%), maximum oxygen uptake was significantly higher (P < 0.01) during atrial triggered ventricular pacing (1440 ± 533 ml/min) compared with rate responsive ventricular pacing (1328 ± 536 ml/min). Thus, rate responsive single chamber pacemakers largely enable the same work capacity as dual chamber pacemakers in patients with high degree AV block. Patients with normal left ventricular function may profit most from preserve AV synchrony as shown by the higher maximum oxygen uptake on exercise.

References (41)

  • AD Johnson et al.

    Hypertrophic subaortic stenosis complicated by high degree heart block: successful treatment with an atrial synchronous ventricular pacemaker

    Chest

    (1975)
  • AJ Labovitz et al.

    Noninvasive assessment of pacemaker hemodynamics by Doppler echocardiography: importance of left atrial size

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1985)
  • K Miyatake et al.

    Augmentation of atrial contribution to left ventricular inflow with aging as assessed by intracardiac Dopper flowmetry

    Am J Cardiol

    (1984)
  • S Faerestrand et al.

    Assessment of the work capacity and relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance associated with activity-sensing rate-response pacing

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1987)
  • DP Humen et al.

    Activity-sensing, rate-responsive pacing: improvement in myocardial performance with exercise

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1985)
  • DP Lipkin et al.

    Randomized crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed rate ventricular pacing

    Br Heart J

    (1987)
  • DG Benditt et al.

    Single-chamber cardiac pacing with activity initiated chronotropic response: evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise testing

    Circulation

    (1987)
  • B Lemke et al.

    Einfluss von AV-Synchronisation und Frequenzsteigerung auf die Hämodynamik und das atriale natriuretische Peptid bei Patienten mit totalem AV-Block

    Z Kardiol

    (1990)
  • I Karlöf

    Haemodynamic effect of atrial triggered versus fixed rate pacing at rest and during exercise in complete heart block

    Acta Med Scand

    (1975)
  • CP Lau et al.

    Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers

    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

    (1990)
  • View full text