Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 131, Issue 6, June 1996, Pages 1149-1155
American Heart Journal

Clinical investigation
Risk of catheter-related emboli in patients with atherosclerotic debris in the thoracic aorta

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90090-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of performing cardiac catheterization or intraaortic balloon pump placement in patients with transesophageal echocardiographically detected atherosclerotic aortic debris. Cardiac catheterization was performed in 70 patients with atherosclerotic aortic debris (in 11 via the brachial approach and in 59 via the femoral approach) and in 71 control patients. An embolic event occurred in 10 (17%) of 59 patients with atherosclerotic aortic debris after femoral catheterization compared to 2 (3%) of 71 control patients without atherosclerotic aortic debris (p = 0.01). None of the 11 patients with atherosclerotic aortic debris who underwent brachial catheterization had an embolic event. An intraaortic balloon pump was placed in 10 patients with atherosclerotic aortic debris and in 12 control patients. An embolic event related to placement of the intraaortic balloon pump occurred in 5 (50%) of 10 patients with atherosclerotic aortic debris; no control patient had an embolic event (p = 0.02). Patients with mobile atherosclerotic aortic debris were at the highest risk for catheter-related embolism. The strongest clinical predictors of atherosclerotic aortic debris were advanced age and peripheral vascular disease. Transesophageal echocardiographic recognition of atherosclerotic aortic debris identifies patients at high risk of stroke or peripheral embolism after cardiac catheterization or intraaortic balloon pump placement. If the aortic debris is mobile, the risk is particularly high. When atherosclerotic aortic debris is detected, especially if the debris is mobile, substituting brachial for femoral catheterization and avoiding placement of an intraaortic balloon pump may reduce the risk of embolism.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (146)

  • Reducing Risk for Perioperative Stroke

    2022, Evidence-Based Practice of Anesthesiology
  • Atherosclerotic Disease of the Proximal Aorta

    2021, Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management
  • Atheroembolism to the Breast

    2020, Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • The Hostile Thoracic Aorta: Management Considerations for Severe Aortic Atheroma in a Challenging Case of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Mitral Valve Replacement

    2019, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    A recent meta-analysis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass showed that preoperative IABP insertion was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of low cardiac output syndrome, length of stay, and mortality.51 As already pointed out, the application of an IABP comes with certain risks.7,8,11,12,52–54 A recent retrospective observational study reported the clinical experience with IABP in 588 consecutive high-risk patients at a single university hospital.50

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text