Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 138, Issue 2, August 1999, Pages 291-298
American Heart Journal

A shuttle walk test for assessment of functional capacity in chronic heart failure,☆☆,,★★

Presented in part at the 47th Annual Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia, March 29 to April 1, 1998, and at the XIII World Congress of Cardiology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 26 to 30, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70114-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Background Peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2 ) is a reference parameter in the assessment of functional capacity of patients with chronic heart failure, but the procedure for cardiopulmonary exercise testing with expired gas analysis is complex and expensive, so more simple and available methods are desirable. Methods We compared the usefulness of a time-limited walk test, the 6-minute walk test (6-MT), with that of a symptom-limited walk test, the shuttle walk test (SWT), in the evaluation of patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure. We prospectively studied 46 clinically stable patients in New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (aged 53 ± 10 years, ejection fraction 23% ± 8%, New York Heart Association functional class 2.8 ± 0.7). Each patient performed two 6-MT, two SWT and a cardiopulmonary exercise testing within 2 weeks. Results We found a close correlation between distance walked in SWT and peak VO2 (r = 0.83, P < .001) and a moderate correlation between distance in 6-MT and peak VO2 (r = 0.69, P < .001). Both walk tests showed to be reproducible after just one practice walk. All patients who walked > 450 m in SWT had a peak VO2 >14 mL/kg/min. The overall discriminatory accuracy for SWT distance was greater than that for 6-MT distance for predicting a peak VO2 <14 mL/kg/min (area under receiver operator characteristic curves 0.97 and 0.83 respectively, P = .02). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis, including clinical, exercise testing, echocardiographic, radionuclide-angiographic, and rest hemodynamic data, showed that distance walked in SWT was the only independent predictor of peak VO2 (P < .001) and the strongest predictor of percent achieved of age- and sex-predicted peak VO2 (%PVO2 ) (P < .001), with only age offering additional information (P = .02). Conclusions The SWT shows to be a feasible and safe method to evaluate patients with chronic heart failure that strongly and independently predicts peak VO2 and %PVO2. This symptom-limited walk test seems to be more useful than 6-MT in the assessment of functional capacity in these patients. (Am Heart J 1999;138:291-8.)

Section snippets

Patients

The study population consisted of 46 patients with CHF symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <40% who underwent cardiopulmonary assessment in the Heart Failure Unit of our Hospital. All patients had at least a 6-month history of heart failure symptoms, and their functional class had been stable for the last 3 weeks. Exclusion criteria were acute myocardial infarction in the last 3 months, angina during exercise, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, primary pulmonary disease, or

Cycle ergometry cardiopulmonary exercise testing

The mean peak VO2 was 17.8 ± 4.4 mL/kg/min, and %PVO2 was 62.7% ± 17.8%. Maximal workload achieved was 56 ± 20 W. The anaerobic threshold was 14.4 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min, at a mean of 81% ± 12% of peak VO2 (and at 49% ± 16% of %PVO2 ). The respiratory exchange ratio at maximal exercise was 1.09 ± 0.10. One patient repeated the exercise testing because of not achieving the anaerobic threshold the first time. All tests were concluded because of fatigue or dyspnea.

Walk tests

Distances walked in 6-MT ranged from 250

Discussion

In this study we have applied the SWT to patients with heart failure first, finding that it is a simple and safe method to assess their functional capacity; in addition, it is reproducible after just one practice walk. Distance walked in SWT correlates with peak VO2 and %PVO2 better than distance in 6-MT does.

Peak VO2 measurement is a reference parameter in the assessment of patients with heart failure, and its prognostic value is well known.3, 4, 5 However, CPET with expired gas analysis is

Acknowledgements

We thank Evan Loh, MD, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, for his critical review of this manuscript and his valuable suggestions.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (109)

  • Interpreting Meaningful Change in the Distance Walked in the 10-Metre ISWT in Cardiac Rehabilitation

    2019, Heart Lung and Circulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    The 10-metre incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) is a commonly used externally paced and incremental field exercise test in cardiac rehabilitation [9]. Previous research has supported both the retest reliability of this test when either one or two tests were performed on admission to cardiac rehabilitation [10–15] and criterion validity when either one or two tests were performed [10,11,14–17]. An important aspect of measurement properties is the interpretability of the change scores.

  • Poor performance in incremental shuttle walk and cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts poor overall survival for patients undergoing esophago-gastric resection

    2018, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Those achieving an ISWT result of greater or less than 350 m have a lower or higher operative risk respectively [8]. Studies have suggested that ISWT and CPET tests correlate well with each other [16,17]. As part of a perioperative enhanced recovery program an assessment of patient fitness was undertaken at initial presentation with OG cancer.

View all citing articles on Scopus

From the Departments of aCardiology and bPneumology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital.

☆☆

Supported by a grant from the Public Health Service of Andalucía, Spain (Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía).

Reprint requests: Francisco J. Morales, MD, Cayetano del Toro, #46, 11010 Cádiz, Spain.

★★

0002-8703/99/$8.00 + 0   4/1/96000

View full text