Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 138, Issue 3, September 1999, Pages 460-467
American Heart Journal

Pulmonary function, cardiac function, and exercise capacity in a follow-up of patients with congestive heart failure treated with carvedilol,☆☆,,★★

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70148-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Background Chronic heart failure causes disturbances in ventilation and pulmonary gas transfer that participate in limiting peak exercise oxygen uptake (VO2p ). The β-adrenergic receptor blocker carvedilol improves left ventricular (LV) function and not VO2p . This study was aimed at investigating the pulmonary response to changes in LV performance produced by carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods Twenty-one patients with New York Heart Association class II to III heart failure were randomly assigned (2 to 1) to carvedilol (25 mg twice daily, n = 14) or placebo (n = 7) for 6 months. Rest forced expiratory volume (FEV1 ), vital capacity, total lung capacity, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, its alveolar-capillary membrane component, pulmonary venous and transmitral flows (for monitoring changes in LV end-diastolic pressure), LV diastolic and systolic dimensions, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and fiber shortening velocity were measured at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. VO2p , peak ratio of dead space to tidal volume (VD/VTp ), ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 ), and VO2 at anaerobic threshold (VO2at ) were also determined. Results FEV1 , vital capacity, total lung capacity, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, and the alveolar-capillary membrane component were impaired in chronic heart failure compared with 14 volunteers and did not vary with treatment. Carvedilol reduced end-diastolic pressure, end-diastolic diameter, and end-systolic diameter and increased ejection fraction, stroke volume, and fiber shortening velocity without affecting VO2p , VO2at , VD/VTp , or VE/VCO2 at 3 and 6 months. Placebo did not produce significant changes. Conclusions In chronic heart failure carvedilol ameliorates LV function at rest and does not significantly affect ventilation and pulmonary gas transfer or functional capacity. These results suggest that improvement in cardiac hemodynamics with carvedilol does not reverse pulmonary dysfunction. Persistent lung impairment might have some role in the failure of carvedilol to improve exercise performance. (Am Heart J 1999;138:460-7.)

Section snippets

Patients and controls

Patients had either idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic heart disease (previous myocardial infarction and cardiac enlargement). Patients were enrolled if they (1) had chronic stable New York Heart Association functional class II to III heart failure from cardiac dysfunction, (2) had left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, (3) were in sinus rhythm, and (4) were able to complete a maximal cardiopulmonary bicycle ergometer exercise test. Patients were excluded if they (1) had history of

Pulmonary function

Patients with CHF exhibited a significant reduction of FEV1 , maximal voluntary ventilation, VC, and TLC. Compared with normal individuals, DLCO and its 2 subcomponents (DM and VC ) were significantly altered. The reduction in DLCO was caused by reduction in DM , and the alveolar-capillary diffusive resistance formed a greater proportion of the total pulmonary diffusive resistance (DLCO/DM ) than in healthy patients. VC was greater in patients than in controls (Table I).

. Anthropometric,

Discussion

Despite treatment with digitalis and diuretics, ejection fraction in these patients averaged 34%. Their mean VO2p was 62.5% ± 12% of predicted normal value, and in any case was <20 mL/min/kg, which corresponds to class B, according to the classification proposed by Weber and Janicki.23 This point makes us cautious concerning generalization of the study findings and suggests an application at present only to this category of patients with CHF.

As described in CHF,1, 2, 3 the lung function in

References (30)

  • S Puri et al.

    Reduced alveolar-capillary diffusing capacity in chronic heart failure. Its pathophysiological relevance and relationship to exercise performance

    Circulation

    (1995)
  • M Guazzi et al.

    Improvement in alveolar-capillary membrane diffusing capacity with enalapril in chronic heart failure and counteracting effect of aspirin

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • M Packer et al.

    Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The Precise trial

    Circulation

    (1996)
  • EM Gilbert et al.

    Comparative hemodynamic, left ventricular functional and antiadrenergic effects of chronic treatment with metoprolol versus carvedilol in the failing heart

    Circulation

    (1996)
  • Australia/New Zeland Heart Failure Research Collaboration Group

    Randomized placebo-controlled trial of carvedilol in patients with congestive heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease

    Lancet

    (1997)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Endothelial dysfunction and lung capillary injury in cardiovascular diseases

      2015, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Beta-blockers do not provide a similar reverse remodeling of the alveolar pneumocytes such as that occurring in the biological properties of cardiomyocytes. A 6 month follow-up with carvedilol did not promote any improvement in DLco or Dm.60 The concern that antiarrhythmic treatment with amiodarone may exert untoward effects on lung diffusion may very likely be excluded by the demonstration in a relatively large population of HF patients that no DLco changes occurred after 1 year of amiodarone treatment.61

    • Effects of interval exercise training on respiratory drive in patients with chronic heart failure

      2010, Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several central or peripheral pathophysiological mechanisms, such as low cardiac output, pulmonary hypertension,4 increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise, and peripheral myopathy,5 contribute to exercise intolerance in CHF. Respiratory abnormalities, including restrictive and obstructive breathing patterns,6–8 decreased lung compliance,9 decreased diffusion capacity,10 hyperventilation,11 ventilation–perfusion mismatch,12 bronchial hyper-responsiveness,13 respiratory muscle weakness14,15 and decreased inspiratory capacity16 have also been observed in these patients. The respiratory drive in patients suffering from CHF is significantly higher than in normal subjects, indicating the exertion of a greater respiratory effort, associated with an increased dyspnea score.17

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    From the Istituto di Cardiologia dell’Università degli Studi, Centro di Studio per le Ricerche Cardiovascolari del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Fondazione “Monzino”, I.R.C.C.S., Milano, Italy.

    ☆☆

    Supported in part by a grant from the National Research Council and the Monzino Foundation, Milan, Italy.

    Reprint requests: Marco Guazzi, MD, Istituto di Cardiologia, Via C. Parea, 4, 20138 Milano, Italy.

    ★★

    0002-8703/99/$8.00 + 0   4/1/94802

    View full text