Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter: Standard Techniques and New Advances

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00562-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Direct current electric shocks have been used to terminate atrial arrhythmias (cardioversion) in humans since the 1960s. The likelihood of successful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm is increased if the left atrium is not markedly enlarged and fibrotic, if there is no marked left atrial hypertension (e.g., mitral stenosis), and if the arrhythmia is not long-standing. To minimize the risk of thromboembolic phenomena, therapeutic anticoagulation should be established for at least 3 weeks before and for 4 weeks after cardioversion; coumadin is usually used for this purpose. A more recent approach uses transesophageal echocardiography to demonstrate the absence of thrombi in the left atrium and left atrial appendage. If no thrombi are evident, 48 hours of heparin anticoagulation may be adequate prior to cardioversion. Anticoagulation is still required after cardioversion. Quinidine and digitalis, singly or in combination, are frequently used to achieve and maintain sinus rhythm in association with cardioversion. For the procedure itself, traditional hand-held paddle electrodes or self-adhesive electrode pads may be used; the apex-anterior and anterior-posterior positions are equally effective. Gel couplants and firm pressure should always be used with hand-held paddles to reduce transthoracic impedance and maximize current flow. Electrodes should be widely separated to avoid shunting of current along the chest wall between electrodes. Generally, electrodes should be large in size; small “pediatric” electrodes should only be used in infants <1 year of age (<10 kg). Shocks should always be synchronized to the R wave to avoid the vulnerable period and the inadvertent induction of ventricular fibrillation. Initial shocks for atrial fibrillation should begin at 100 J; atrial flutter generally requires a smaller shock (initial shocks at 50 J). Effective anesthesia, not merely sedation, is required to achieve amnesia and avoid pain. Exciting new developments in defibrillation and cardioversion have occurred. It is now understood that excessive energy and current may induce cardiac damage, and recent studies suggest such damage may be mediated in part by free radicals. New shock waveforms, such as biphasic and multiphasic waveforms from multiple encircling electrodes, may be superior to the standard damped sinusoidal waveform. (Am J Cardiol 1996;78(suppl 8A):22–26)

Section snippets

STANDARD CARDIOVERSION TECHNIQUES

Patient selection: Although any patient with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter may be a candidate for electrical cardioversion, there are certain features that predict immediate success and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The best candidates are patients without mitral valve disease, or without a very large or fibrotic left atrium, and patients with relatively short histories of atrial arrhythmia. Conversely, mitral stenosis, a large, fibrotic left atrium, and long-standing atrial

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRICAL CARDIOVERSION

Defibrillation injury: Although cardioversion is an effective procedure, excessive energy and current can induce myocardial damage. This subject has been reviewed extensively by VanVleet and Tacker.[23]Such damage can be manifested by gross and histologic abnormalities, by positive scintigrams, by elevations in cardiac enzymes in plasma, and by atrioventricular block after defibrillation. The mechanism of such damage is not well understood. Recent research has suggested that electric shocks

References (33)

  • PM Zoll et al.

    Termination of ventricular fibrillation in man by externally applied electric countershock

    N Engl J Med

    (1956)
  • B Lown et al.

    New method for terminating cardiac arrhythmias: use of synchronized capacitor discharge

    JAMA

    (1962)
  • WL Henry et al.

    Relation between echocardiographically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation

    Circulation

    (1976)
  • IW Black et al.

    Exclusion of atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography does not preclude embolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a multi-center study

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • P Pagadala et al.

    Thromboembolic risk of chronic atrial flutter: is the risk underestimated (Abstr)?

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • WJ Manning et al.

    Cardioversion from atrial fibrillation without prolonged anticoagulation with use of transesophageal echocardiography to exclude the presence of atrial thrombi

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Low energy biphasic cardioversion of atrial flutter: Results from a pilot trial

      2010, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore the anterior–lateral electrode position (A–L) is superior in terms of success [4,5]. The present prospective pilot trial was initiated to evaluate whether a biphasic low energy step up protocol reveals further key benefits compared to existing recommendations or consensus of expert opinions [5–7]. This study was a prospective single-center pilot trial to assess the efficacy of low energy biphasic cardioversion with A–L electrode position in patients with common type atrial flutter.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text