Results of coronary stenting for unstable versus stable angina pectoris
References (25)
- et al.
Outcome of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in subsets of unstable angina pectoris
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1994) - et al.
Early percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the management of unstable angina pectoris
Int J Cardiol
(1987) - et al.
Coronary angioplasty for unstable angina: immediate and late results in 200 consecutive patients with identification of risk factors for unfavorable early and late outcome
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1988) Percutaneous coronary angioplasty in stable and unstable angina
Cardiol Clin
(1991)- et al.
Short-, medium- and long term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for stable and unstable angina pectoris
Am Heart J
(1989) - et al.
Intracoronary thrombus and complex morphology in unstable angina
Circulation
(1989) EPILOG and CAPTURE trials halted because of positive interim results
Circulation
(1996)- et al.
A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease
N Engl J Med
(1994) - et al.
A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease
N Engl J Med
(1994) - et al.
Intracoronary stenting for acute or threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Circulation
(1992)
Classification of unstable angina
Circulation
Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: implications for patients selection
Circulation
Cited by (38)
2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
2011, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :In a comparison of the use of the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent in patients with stable angina and patients with UA, no significant differences were found with respect to in-hospital outcome or restenosis rates (597). Another study found similar rates of initial angiographic success and in-hospital major complications in stented patients with UA compared with those with stable angina (598). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months were also similar between the 2 groups, whereas the need for repeat PCI and target-vessel revascularization was actually less in the UA group.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)...
2007, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Published success rates of PCI in patients with UA/NSTEMI are high overall. Outcomes have approached those of elective surgery with the use of stents and potent antiplatelet therapy (207–209). The use of drug-eluting stents for UA/NSTEMI has increased dramatically in recent years, with favorable rates of early death and recurrent infarction (210).
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)...
2007, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :In a comparison of the use of the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent in patients with stable angina and patients with UA, no significant differences were found with respect to in-hospital outcome or restenosis rates (597). Another study found similar rates of initial angiographic success and in-hospital major complications in stented patients with UA compared with those with stable angina (598). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months were also similar between the 2 groups, whereas the need for repeat PCI and target-vessel revascularization was actually less in the UA group.
Acute Coronary Syndrome May Occur With In-Stent Restenosis and Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes (The PRESTO Trial)
2006, American Journal of CardiologyEarly angioplasty in acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation improves outcome but increases the need for six-month repeat revascularization: An analysis of the PURSUIT trial
2002, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :However, “cooling down” of ACS before PCI may be unfavorable, with respect to 30-day MI and possibly death. In a number of recent trials and PURSUIT sub-analyses, the benefit of intervention over conservative treatment is demonstrated (Fig. 2) (4,22,23). For example, the recently published FRISC-2 trial demonstrated a benefit of intervention versus conservative treatment.
Interventional therapy of the acute coronary syndromes
2002, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases