One-stage coronary angiography and angioplasty
Reference (20)
- et al.
Angioplasty of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: initial success and long-term follow-up
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1992) - et al.
Multivessel coronary angioplasty from 1980 to 1989: procedural results and long-term outcome
J Am Coll Cordial
(1990) - et al.
Coronary angioplasty after coronary bypass surgery: initial results and late outcome in 422 patients
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1990) - et al.
Myocardial salvage with direct coronary angioplasty for acute infarction
Am Heart J
(1992) - et al.
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the use of coronary angioplasty and integration of new support devices into patient management
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1992) - et al.
ACC/AHA Task Force Report: guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1988) - et al.
Safety and cost effectiveness of combined coronary angiography and angioplasty
Am Heart J
(1991) - et al.
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty performed at the time of diagnostic catheterization compared with that performed at other times
Am J Cardiol
(1989) - et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
High-dose contrast agent administration during complex coronary angioplasty
Am Heart J
(1990)
Cited by (44)
Guidance on reuse of cardio-vascular catheters and devices in India: A consensus document
2017, Indian Heart JournalCitation Excerpt :(G) Reuse in Cardiology: Various studies have reported reprocessing and reuse of coronary angioplasty balloon catheters,31–38 diagnostic and radiofrequency ablation EP catheters39–46 and pacemakers and implantable devices to be safe and cost effective.10,47–58 (G.1) Reuse of devices in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI): The practice of reprocessing and reusing PCI balloon catheters is presently not common in the West.
Predictors and Outcomes of Ad Hoc Versus Non-Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
2009, JACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsOutcomes Following Immediate (Ad Hoc) Versus Staged Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (Report from the 2000 to 2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry)<sup>†</sup>†This study was performed with the permission of the New York State Department of Health, which retains ownership of the Registry.
2007, American Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Previous studies have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ad hoc procedures, with mixed results.2–12 Nine studies that were performed before the stent era reported similar angiographic success rates or postprocedural complications.2–10 In 2 of these studies, ad hoc procedures were associated with an increased risk of complications in subgroups of patients with unstable angina pectoris, multivessel disease, advanced age (>65 years old), and those who underwent multilesion angioplasty.6,10
Ad hoc transradial coronary angioplasty strategy: Experience and results in a single centre
2003, International Journal of CardiologyACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography)
1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology