Elsevier

Clinical Biochemistry

Volume 33, Issue 5, July 2000, Pages 359-368
Clinical Biochemistry

Analytical
Analytical and diagnostic performance of troponin assays in patients suspicious for acute coronary syndromes

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9120(00)00144-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: The controversy whether there is a clinically significant difference between troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) in regard to predictive value and cardiac specificity is still ongoing.

Methods: We evaluated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay systems for cTnI and cTnT in patients with acute coronary syndromes and multiple control groups to define threshold values for risk stratification and compare their predictive value.

Results: In 312 patients with noncardiac chest pain, cTnI levels were below the detection limit of 0.2 μg/L and cTnT levels were 0.011 [0.010–0.013] μg/L. In patients with end-stage renal failure (n = 26) and acute (n = 38) or chronic (n = 16) skeletal muscle damage, median concentrations were 0.20 [0.20–0.35], below the detection limit, and 0.20 [0.20–0.25] for cTnI, and 0.04 [0.01–0.10], 0.011 [0.005–0.025], and 0.032 [0.009–0.054] μg/L for cTnT. In patients with acute coronary syndromes (n = 1130), maximized prognostic value for 30-day outcome (death, infarction) was observed at a threshold level of 1.0 μg/L for cTnI (29.0% positive) and at 0.06 μg/L for cTnT (35.0% positive). Significant differences in the area-under-the-curve values were observed between cTnI and cTnT (0.685 vs. 0.802; p = 0.005). For both markers, the area-under-the-curve values did not increase with the second (within 24 h after enrollment) or third (48 h) blood draw. CTnI showed a less strong association with 30-day outcome than cTnT. When cTnI was put in a logistic multiple-regression model first, cTnT did add significant information.

Conclusion: By using the defined threshold values and the employed test systems, single testing for cTnI and cTnT within 12 h after symptom onset was appropriate for risk stratification. Despite the lower cardiac specificity for cTnT, it appears to have a stronger association with the patients’ outcome, whereas, as previously shown, the ability to identify patients who benefit from treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist is similar.

Introduction

For patients with unstable coronary artery disease (i.e., unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction), the main pathophysiological mechanism in the form of plaque rupture or erosion is followed by exposure of thrombogenic contents, such as collagen to the circulation 1, 2. The resulting platelet activation and platelet adhesion promotes thrombus friable formation. Pathohistological studies have disclosed focal cell necroses distal in the myocardium supplied by the culprit artery, which have been attributed to repetitive embolization from such liable thrombi 3, 4. In about one third of such patients, the resulting minor myocardial damage leads to increased values of troponin I (cTnI) and troponin T (cTnT; 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Although creatine kinase enzyme activity remains within the normal range, for such troponin-positive patients, a 5–10-fold higher incidence for mortality and nonfatal infarction during 30-day follow-up period has been observed 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

The controversy whether there is a clinically significant difference between cTnI and cTnT in regard to predictive value and cardiac specificity is still ongoing. The main purpose of the present study was the definition of threshold values for each of the employed test systems—the AxSYM for cTnI and the Elecsys 2010 for cTnT—to maximize and compare their prognostic value in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Section snippets

Patients with noncardiac chest pain

Patients had chest pain for less than 12 h before arrival in the emergency but did not provide evidence for coronary artery disease. These patients had to have no ST-segment changes during serial electrocardiographic recordings in the emergency room and negative treadmill testing, stress echocardiography, or angiogram (53%). Further, during 30-day follow-up, no major cardiac events (death, nonfatal infarction, or urgent revascularization) were recorded. A total of 312 patients were

Total imprecision

Using manufacturer-provided controls, total imprecision (CV) over a 6-month period was evaluated by performing 291 runs. For the AxSYM, CVs were 7.4% at 3.1 μg/L, 6.3% at 10.2 μg/L, and 5.1% at 31.2 μg/L. For the Elecsys 2010, CVs were 4.8% at 0.35 μg/L, 4.3% at 1.25 μg/L, and 4.1% at 31.2 μg/L. Total imprecision for samples close to the calculated threshold values (cTnI 1.0 μg/L; cTnT 0.08 μg/L) was investigated by using internal plasma controls from patients with “minor myocardial damage”

Analytical performance

In this study, the AxSYM cTnI assay provided acceptable analytical characteristics based on imprecision, detection limit, and limit of quantification. Stepwise dilution tests revealed a minimal detectable cTnI concentration of 0.2 μg/L. By using the Stratus CS, the same sample produced a test signal equal to 0.02 μg/L. This figure is close to the determined detection limit of the Stratus CS with 0.01 μg/L, a cTnI system that recently has been shown to provide outstanding analytical and

References (26)

  • C Heeschen et al.

    Evaluation of a rapid whole blood ELISA for quantification of Troponin I in patients with acute chest pain

    Clin Chem

    (1999)
  • O Hetland et al.

    Cardiac troponins I and T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromea comparative study in a routine setting

    Clin Chem

    (1998)
  • M.S Luescher et al.

    Applicability of cardiac troponin T and I for early risk stratification in unstable coronary disease

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Serum levels of cardiac troponin I in patients with status epilepticus and healthy cardiovascular system

      2013, Archives of Medical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      With respect to the biochemical and analytical differences of cTnT and cTnI, the comparability, measurement and clinical performance of these two subtypes are not the same (23). cTnT has been previously shown to be less specific for cardiac injuries (24) and recently demonstrated that the newer cTnI high-sensitivity assay could detect cardiac injury at even earlier intervals prior to histological findings (25). So far, most of the previous studies on assessment of troponin level in epileptic patients were used to assess cTnI, including the current study.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text