CommentaryMetabolic, functional, and haemodynamic staging for CHF?
References (10)
- et al.
24th Bethesda Conference. Task Force 3. Recipient guidelines/prioritisation
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1993) - et al.
Improving survival for patients with advanced heart failure: a study of 737 consecutive patients
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1995) - et al.
Prognostic value of plasma soluble intercellular adhesion molecular-1 and endothelin-1 concentration in patients with chronic congestive heart failure
Am J Cardiol
(1995) - et al.
Exercise capacity for survivors of cardiac transplantation or sustained medical therapy for stable heart failure
Circulation
(1990) - et al.
Serial assessment of exercise capacity after heart transplantation
J Heart Lung Transplant
(1995)
Cited by (35)
A multi-biomarker risk score improves prediction of long-term mortality in patients with advanced heart failure
2013, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :The present multimarker approach differs widely from previous published multivariable HF risk scores due to the broad range of covered biological pathways including inflammation and chemotaxis, immunological activation, oxidative stress, cell growth and proliferation, remodelling and fibrogenesis, angiogenesis, apoptosis and additionally neurohormonal modulation and myocardial stress. The rationale for this approach is the multisystemic character of HF [1,5,6] which makes it unlikely that BNP or any other single biomarker could represent all underlying pathophysiologic processes appropriately. Most of the former risk scores were predominantly based on clinical and routine laboratory characteristics and did not use novel biomarkers [8–10,12,27].
Preserved muscle protein metabolism in obese patients with chronic heart failure
2012, International Journal of CardiologyRisk stratification in patients with chronic heart failure based on metabolic-immunological, functional and haemodynamic parameters
2012, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Our group [14] has previously shown that by the combined assessment of LVEF (cut-off 25%), pVO2 (cut-off 14 mL/min/kg), and UA (cut-off 565 μmol/L) prognostic ranking of CHF patients into 4 different risk groups is possible and predictive of impaired survival. This ranking, using a metabolic-immunological, functional and haemodynamic approach [20] covered risk groups from very low (no risk factor: 12-month survival 98%) to extremely high mortality (three risk factors: 12-month survival 31%) [14]. Based on this straight-forward risk assessment, valuable clinical information can be obtained in order to guide different follow-up strategies and individual patient care.
Natriuretic peptides and other biomarkers in chronic heart failure: From BNP, NT-proBNP, and MR-proANP to routine biochemical markers
2009, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, the relative risk for death in patients with uric acid concentration ≥ 565 µmol/l was 7.4 [95% CI 4.2–12.1]), which also was the most powerful prognosticator [63]. Importantly, uric acid was also used as part of metabolic (uric acid ≥ 565 µmol/l), functional (peak VO2 ≤ 14 mL/kg/min), and hemodynamic (LVEF ≤ 25%) staging [64]. For an increasing number of risk factors, a stepwise increase of mortality was observed and reached 87.5% at 3 years in a subgroup of patients with all three risk factors [63].
Hyperuricaemia predicts poor outcome in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure
2007, International Journal of CardiologyThe regulation and measurement of plasma volume in heart failure
2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology