Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 349, Issue 9053, 8 March 1997, Pages 667-674
The Lancet

Articles
Randomised trial of effect of amiodarone on mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after recent myocardial infarction: EMIAT*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)09145-3Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Ventricular arrhythmias are a major cause of death after myocardial infarction, especially in patients with poor left-ventricular function. Previous attempts to identify and suppress arrhythmias with various antiarrhythmic drugs failed to reduce or actually increase mortality. Amiodarone is a powerful antiarrhythmic drug with several potentially beneficial actions, and has shown benefit in several small-scale studies. We postulated that this drug might reduce mortality in patients at high risk of death after myocardial infarction because of impaired ventricular function, irrespective of whether they had ventricular arrhythmias.

Methods

The European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT) was a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial to assess whether amiodarone reduced all-cause mortality (primary endpoint) and cardiac mortality and arrhythmic death (secondary endpoints) in survivors of myocardial infarction with a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less. Intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses were done.

Findings

EMIAT enrolled 1486 patients (743 in the amiodarone group, 743 in the placebo group). Median follow-up was 21 months. All-cause mortality (103 deaths in the amiodarone group, 102 in the placebo group) and cardiac mortality did not differ between the two groups. However, in the amiodarone group, there was a 35% risk reduction (95% CI 0–58, p=0·05) in arrhythmic deaths.

Interpretation

Our findings do not support the systematic prophylactic use of amiodarone in all patients with depressed left-ventricular function after myocardial infarction. However, the lack of proarrhythmia and the reduction in arrhythmic death support the use of amiodarone in patients for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated.

Introduction

Ventricular arrhythmias are one of the main causes of death in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. The European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT) was conceived at the end of 1988, after many studies of antiarrhythmic drugs that block the sodium-channel (class I) showed no efficacy in the suppression of arrhythmias and prevention of death in survivors of myocardial infarction.1, 2, 3 Later, the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials proved that in survivors of myocardial infarction at low risk of death, the suppression of ventricular extrasystoles with the sodium-channel-blocking drugs flecainide and encainide, and possibly moricizine, was associated with excess mortality.4, 5 Apart from β-adrenergic blocking agents, the only antiarrhythmic drug that showed any promise in the late 1980s was amiodarone, although the number of patients studied was too small to allow definite conclusions about the drug's effect on all-cause mortality.6, 7, 8 We, therefore, decided to conduct a large trial of amiodarone in survivors of myocardial infarction at increased risk of death.9, 10

Although the presence of frequent or complex ventricular arrhythmias is an independent risk factor for mortality after myocardial infarction,11, 12, 13 and most trials of antiarrhythmic drugs have used such ventricular arrhythmias as an entry criterion, there is no evidence that suppression of ventricular arrhythmias leads to a reduction in overall mortality. Moreover, the single most powerful independent predictor of mortality, including sudden death, is left-ventricular dysfunction.13, 14 Thus, we decided to adopt a different approach from the other trials by taking no account of the presence of symptomless arrhythmias and by choosing depressed left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as the main entry criterion. We expected that most patients with left-ventricular dysfunction would subsequently suffer from lethal arrhythmias, even if ventricular arrhythmias were not initially present. In addition to its antiarrhythmic properties, amiodarone has anti-ischaemic actions and does not aggravate heart failure, properties that may have an additional beneficial effect on survivors of myocardial infarction.

The aim of this randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial was to assess the effect of amiodarone on all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and arrhythmic death in survivors of myocardial infarction with depressed left-venticular function.

EMIAT was a joint venture between the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and Sanofi Recherche.

Section snippets

Methods

We recruited patients for this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial from the coronary-care units of participating European hospitals between Nov 30, 1990, and Oct 30, 1995. A log-book was kept of all patients with documented myocardial infarction surviving 5 days. Eligible patients were those aged 18–75 years who had a LVEF on multiple-gated nuclear angiography (MUGA) of 40% or less. MUGA was done 5–21 days after admission to the coronary-care unit.

We excluded women of childbearing

Results

We recruited 26 493 patients from 75 centres in 15 European countries. 7565 of the patients underwent a MUGA scan, and in 3255 (43%) the LVEF was 40% or less. We excluded 1769 patients with ejection fractions in the acceptable range because of lack of consent (409), imminent cardiac surgery (286), other serious illness (205), congestive cardiac failure (179), amiodarone treatment within the previous 6 months (142), essential antiarrhythmic treatment (142), and other contraindications (406).

Discussion

EMIAT showed that amiodarone was associated with a significant reduction in arrhythmic deaths and resuscitated cardiac arrests among patients discharged from hospital with depressed left-ventricular function after recent myocardial infarction. However, neither a significant nor corresponding reduction in all-cause or total cardiac mortality was seen because of increased non-cardiac, or cardiac but not arrhythmic, mortality. Thus, EMIAT does not support the systemic prophylactic use of this

References (39)

  • SH Gottlieb et al.

    Prophylactic antiarrhythmic theapy of high-risk survivors of myocardial infarction: lower mortality at 1 month but not at 1 year

    Circulation

    (1987)
  • (CAST) Investigators. Preliminary report: effect of encanide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction

    N Engl J Med

    (1989)
  • II Investigators. Effect of the antiarrhythmic agent moricizine on survival after myocardial infarction

    N Engl J Med

    (1992)
  • L Ceremuzynski et al.

    Effect of amiodarone on mortality after myocardial infarction: a double blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1992)
  • JA Cairns et al.

    Post-myocardial infarction mortality in patients with ventricular premature depolarizations: the Canadian amiodarone myocardial infarction arrhythmia trial

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • PJ Schwartz et al.

    Does amiodiarone reduce sudden death and cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction? The European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT)

    Eur Heart J

    (1994)
  • AJ Camm et al.

    The European Myocardial Infarct Amiodarone Trial (EMIAT)

    Am J Cardiol

    (1993)
  • W Ruberman et al.

    Ventricular premature beats and mortality after myocradial infarction

    N Engl J Med

    (1977)
  • AJ Moss et al.

    Ventricular ectopic beats and their relation to sudden and nonsudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction

    Circulation

    (1978)
  • Cited by (0)

    *

    Investigators listed at end of paper

    View full text