Original contribution
Outcomes in unsuccessful field resuscitation attempts

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(89)80834-0Get rights and content

To determine the outcomes of patients who did not regain vital signs after prehospital advanced cardiac life support, we studied adult patients who sustained nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our study consisted of a 20-month retrospective review of 244 charts beginning January 1986. Twelve patients were excluded for drug overdose, family request, or unavailable data. Of the remaining 232 patients, 51 had a rhythm and pulse on arrival at the emergency department. The record of each of the remaining 181 patients was analyzed for age, sex, location, witness, CPR initiator, advanced life support unit response time, initial field rhythm, and initial ECG rhythm. Outcome alternatives were dead in emergency department or hospital admission. All hospitalized patients were further evaluated for survival to discharge and neurologic status at discharge. Ten of the 181 patients (6%) who failed prehospital resuscitation survived to hospitalization, and one (0.6%) was discharged neurologically intact. Survival to hospital admission did not correlate with any of the variables studied except gender. The one patient who survived a failed prehospital resuscitation was not endotracheally intubated in the field. Our data support the practice of pronouncing adult nontraumatic cardiac arrest victims who fail to respond to advanced cardiac life support efforts in the field as dead at the scene.

Cited by (91)

  • Re-examining outcomes after unsuccessful out-of-hospital resuscitation in the era of field termination of resuscitation guidelines and regionalized post-resuscitation care

    2014, Resuscitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    A witnessed collapse, bystander CPR, a shockable arrest rhythm, a brief down time (i.e. time from collapse to restoration of circulation), and ROSC prior to emergency department admission portend a favorable outcome. Dismal prognosis after failed out-of-hospital resuscitation and extended resuscitation efforts in the emergency department has been demonstrated.2–6 Even if emergency department efforts are successful, survival to hospital admission and survival to discharge with a good neurologic outcome, typically defined as an overall cerebral performance category score of 1–2, is unlikely.

  • Medical futility

    2013, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
  • Validation of 3 Termination of Resuscitation Criteria for Good Neurologic Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    2009, Annals of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Other factors independently associated with survival include the patient's age,4 the location of the arrest,5 an arrest witnessed by bystanders or EMS personnel,6 and return of spontaneous circulation before transport by paramedics.7 Conversely, patients with an initial arrest rhythm of asystole, pulseless electrical activity, or failure to respond to either basic life support (BLS) or advanced life support (ALS) in the out-of-hospital setting have uniformly dismal outcomes.3,8,9 Considering the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and the resources used to treat these patients, a set of criteria to predict good neurologic survival to hospital discharge would be extremely useful.

  • Transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation may not be futile

    2008, British Journal of Anaesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    In most reports on CPR during transport, EMS systems without out-of-hospital physicians are described. A major contributing difference to the system in our report is the physician's decision to terminate resuscitation efforts, which is not the case in most systems.1 2 4–7 14 19–21 The reasons why the emergency physician decided to transport the patient instead of aborting CPR efforts were not documented.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the National Association of EMS Physicians, Washington, DC, June 1988.

View full text