Elsevier

Early Human Development

Volume 60, Issue 1, November 2000, Pages 35-42
Early Human Development

The effects of pre- and post-natal sunlight exposure on human growth: evidence from the Southern Hemisphere

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(00)00102-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Several recent studies have reported a causal association between stature and month of birth. Perinatal exposure to sunlight has been suggested as the principal factor underlying this relationship, although the mechanisms involved remain a matter of debate. The longitudinal design of the present study allowed us to directly test the influence of perinatal sunlight exposure (and other meteorological and behavioural factors) on body size at birth and at regular intervals up to age 26. The findings confirmed that pre-natal sunlight is one of the most significant determinants of height. However, the trimester of greatest influence differs depending on the age at which study members were measured.

Introduction

The intriguing finding that body size varies according to season of birth in both humans [1], [2] and animals [3] has led to speculation concerning the role of perinatal exposure to sunlight for development. The seasonal variation has been hypothesised to result from environmental exposure (e.g., sunlight [1], total energy reaching earth or fluctuations in temperature [3]) influencing hormonal expression between mother and developing foetus.

Some studies, however, have failed to find any seasonal effect on body size [4], [5]. This issue is complicated further by incongruities both between and within studies. For instance, Weber et al. [1] showed that height varied up to 6-mm depending on whether 18-year-old Austrian males were born in spring (i.e., maximum height in April) or autumn (minimum height in October). Although their results indicated that peak sunlight duration occurred in July (thereby corresponding to the first month of gestation and the fourth post-natal month in the tallest males), the authors speculated that the effect was due to “influences extending from the time of late pregnancy to the first post-natal year”. A further report [2] from the Northern Hemisphere found that the stature of a sample of infants was greatest both in the spring and in the autumn.

The initial aim of the present study was to determine if stature fluctuates with season of birth in a Southern Hemisphere population to the degree that has been reported in the above mentioned Northern Hemisphere studies. Further, by cross-correlating fluctuations in daily sunlight hours during pregnancy with the height and weight of infants at birth, the period of maximal influence of sunlight during gestation can be gauged.

Thus, in study 1 we sought to determine the solely pre-natal effects of sunlight on the birth size of a cohort of all infants born between 1967 and 1978 in Dunedin, New Zealand (a city with a population of approximately 120 000). To directly test this relationship, average hours of bright sunshine recorded for each month during the same period were obtained from the New Zealand meteorological service [6]. Variation in average monthly sunshine hours between consecutive years in Dunedin (e.g., April 1971=169 h versus April 1972=82 h) illustrates the importance of gathering data in this way. Typically the maximum duration of sunshine in Dunedin (latitude=45 54 South, longitude=170 31 East, 2 m above MSL) is in January (summer) and the minimum is during June (winter).

In study 2, data from a subset of this population (who were subsequently enrolled in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study [DMHDS] [7]) were employed. The aim of study 2 was to investigate the influence of season of birth (and other meteorological and behaviour factors) on height and weight during development (up to age 26 years). Of particular importance was the longitudinal design of this study in that it allowed us to elucidate which period of sunshine duration (pre- versus post-natal) exerts the most influence on body size.

Section snippets

Study 1

Infants born at the major maternity hospital in Dunedin between 1st August 1967 and 31st July 1978 were included in this study (n=20 021). Data for births in 1974 were not available. Infants were examined with regard to anthropomorphic features (e.g., length, weight, gestational age, head circumference), and their primary caregivers were interviewed within 24–48 h of delivery.

Cross-correlation functions (CCF’s) [8] were calculated from the Fourier transforms of the mean monthly height, weight

Study 1

Spectral analyses [8] revealed that monthly means for neonate height and weight varied sinusoidally at the same frequency as that of the monthly variation in mean bright sunlight hours.

Peak height and weight lagged the month of peak sunlight hours by between 6 and 9 months (Fig. 1). This indicates that any facilitory effect of sunlight hours on birth height and weight was most evident when maximal sunlight was coincident with the early months of pregnancy (i.e. the first trimester).

Study 2

To determine

Discussion

Our findings revealed that the birth length and weight of this Dunedin cohort was strongly influenced by the amount of bright sunshine coincident with the early months of pregnancy. In the sub-sample of members enrolled in the DMHDS height varied up to 8-mm depending on month of birth, with maximum length in October (conception during mid-summer) and minimum length in January (conception during shorter autumn days). That we found significant seasonal variation in a relatively small sample size

Acknowledgements

The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study (DMHDS) is supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand. The authors thank the late Dr. Patricia Buckfield for collecting the neonate data and the DMHDS Study members for their participation and continued support.

References (13)

  • J. Wohlfahrt et al.

    Secular and seasonal variation of length and weight at birth

    Lancet

    (1998)
  • H. Bantje

    Seasonality of births and birthweights in Tanzania

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1987)
  • G.W. Weber et al.

    Height depends on month of birth

    Nature

    (1998)
  • M. Henneberg et al.

    Further studies on the month-of-birth effect on body size: rural schoolchildren and an animal model

    Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol.

    (1993)
  • G. Fallis et al.

    A comparison of seasonal variation in birthweights between rural Zaire and Ontario

    Can. J. Public Health

    (1989)
  • Meteorological Observations for 1967–1973. New Zealand Meteorological Service, Ministry of Transport. P.O. Box 722,...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • The effects of light in children: A systematic review

    2023, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Month of birth and height. A case study in rural Spain

    2022, Economics and Human Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some studies show that perinatal sunlight is the main factor underlying the relationship between stature and the month of birth, although the mechanisms implied are still an issue of debate. The findings also confirm that prenatal sunlight is an important determinant of height (Waldie et al., 2000; Siniarska and Kozieł, 2010; Botyar and Khoramroudi, 2018). The exposure of women to UV radiation had beneficial effects on fetal growth and arterial pressure during the period of pregnancy.

  • Periodontal diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Is there a role for vitamin D?

    2018, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies had shown, around three months of sunlight exposure to the 355 pregnant women (immediately before birth) resulted in elevated serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level [134,135]. More importantly, longitudinal study has shown that prenatal sunlight exposure is one of the most significant determinants of body size at birth and height in adolescence [147]. Of clinical relevance, cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D by sunlight accounts for more than 80% of required vitamin D in humans [148–151].

  • Pregnancy outcome and ultraviolet radiation; A systematic review

    2017, Environmental Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    All studies utilized government birth notification systems to determine their outcomes. Various direct birth weight measures were used by 3 of the studies (Thayer, 2014; Tustin and Hayne, 2004, Waldie, 2000) and measures adjusted for gestational length were used by 2 (Elter et al., 2004; Pereira et al., 2012). Different methods of UV measurement and timing of exposure were also considered.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text