Experimental Studies
Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion?

This work was presented in part at the 46th Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology, March 1997, Anaheim, California.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00212-5Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to determine the basis of detection of stenosis by myocardial contrast echocardiography using venous administration of microbubbles and to define the relative merits of bolus injection versus continuous infusion.

Background. The degree of video intensity (VI) disparity in myocardial beds supplied by stenosed and normal coronary arteries can be used to quantify stenosis severity after venous administration of microbubbles. However, the comparative merits of administering microbubbles as a bolus injection or continuous infusion has not been studied.

Methods. Coronary stenoses of varying severity were created in either the left anterior descending or the left circumflex coronary artery in 18 dogs. Imagent US (AF0150) was given as a bolus injection in 10 dogs (Group I) and as both a bolus injection and a continuous infusion in 8 dogs (Group II). For bolus injections, peak VI was derived from time–intensity plots. During continuous infusion, microbubble velocity and microvascular cross-sectional area were derived from pulsing interval versus VI plots. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was determined using radiolabeled microspheres.

Results. During hyperemia, VI ratios from the stenosed versus normal beds correlated with radiolabeled microsphere–derived MBF ratios from those beds for both bolus injections (r = 0.81) and continuous infusion (r = 0.79). The basis for detection of stenosis common to both techniques was the decrease in myocardial blood volume distal to the stenosis during hyperemia. The advantage of continuous infusion over bolus injection was the abolition of posterior wall attenuation and the ability to quantify MBF.

Conclusions. Both bolus injection and continuous infusion provide quantitative assessment of relative stenosis severity. Compared with bolus injection, continuous infusion also allows quantification of MBF and data acquisition without attenuation of any myocardial bed.

Abbreviations

CBF
coronary blood flow
CBV
coronary blood volume
CSA
cross-sectional area
MBF
myocardial blood flow
MBV
myocardial blood volume
MCE
myocardial contrast echocardiography (echocardiographic)
LAD
left anterior descending coronary artery
LCx
left circumflex coronary artery
VI
video intensity
PI
pulsing interval

Cited by (0)

This study was supported in part by a grant R01-HL48890 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland and by a grant from Alliance Pharmaceutical Corporation, San Diego, California. Hewlett Packard Corporation, Andover, Massachusetts provided an equipment grant, and the radiolabeled microspheres were provided by Dupont-Merck, North Billerica, Massachusetts. Dr. Wei was the recipient of a Junior Personnel Research Fellowship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and Dr. Firoozan was the recipient of a Junior Research Fellowship from the British Heart Foundation, London, England, United Kingdom. Dr. Linka was supported by the Ciba-Geigy Jubiläums-Stiftung, Basel, Switzerland and the Theodor und Ida Herzog-Egli Stiftung, Zurich, Switzerland. Dr. Skyba is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship Grant F32-HL095410 from the National Institutes of Health.