Can nurses safely assess suitability for thrombolytic therapy? A pilot study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-3397(95)80605-9Get rights and content

Thrombolytic therapy reduces mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Early treatment is crucial and any system which reduces ‘door-to-needle’ time without placing the patient at risk is to be encouraged. A group of 20 patients with suspected heart attack was assessed by coronary care nurses and pre-registration house officers with regard to: time of symptom onset; admission 12 lead electrocardiogram, presence of contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. Nurses and house officers were asked to state whether or not they considered thrombolysis indicated, and if so, which agent they would recommend on an ‘intention to treat’ basis. Participating staff were given the option of referral for senior medical opinion. There was no difference in nurses' and house officers' stated intentions regarding thrombolytic therapy. A group of 46 patients was assessed by nurses alone on an ‘intention to treat’ basis; in this latter group nurses' management intentions were identical to those of the responsible doctor prescribing treatment. Appropriately trained nurses can assess patients with suspected heart attack accurately and safely for thrombolytic therapy. In practice, this could reduce delays to thrombolysis and merits further scrutiny.

References (22)

  • BensonNH et al.

    Guidelines for the prehospital use of thrombolytic agents

    Annals of Emergency Medicine

    (1994)
  • BirkheadJS

    Time delays in provision of thrombolytic therapy in six district hospitals

    British Medical Journal

    (1992)
  • de BonoDP et al.

    The management of acute myocardial infarction: guidelines and audit standards

    Report of a workshop of the joint audit committee of the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians of London

    Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London

    (1994)
  • BoutenMJM et al.

    Prehospital thrombolysis with alteplase (rt-PA) in acute myocardial infarction

    European Heart Journal

    (1992)
  • BurnsLMA et al.

    Impact of a policy of direct admission to a coronary care unit on use of thrombolytic therapy

    British Heart Journal

    (1989)
  • DracupK et al.

    Treatment—seeking behaviour amongst those with signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction

    Heart Lung

    (1991)
  • Prehospital thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1993)
  • Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients

    Lancet

    (1994)
  • Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • Feasibility, safety and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampion region early anistreplase trial

    British Medical Journal

    (1992)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Part 9: Acute coronary syndromes: 2010 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

      2010, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The limited evidence available about paramedic false-negative diagnostic decisions, including decisions not to obtain a 12-lead ECG, may affect paramedics’ true overall diagnostic accuracy. Eight observational studies reported that nurses can diagnose STEMI in the context of nurse-initiated fibrinolysis programs (LOE D3121; LOE D4116,122–124; LOE D5125–127). The literature largely describes the ability of nurses to avoid false-positive diagnosis in fibrinolysis programs without substantial evidence about false-negative decisions, which may affect true overall diagnostic accuracy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text