Clinical research study
Classification of Myocardial Infarction: Frequency and Features of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.02.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The classification of myocardial infarction into 5 types was introduced in 2007 as an important component of the universal definition. In contrast to the plaque rupture–related type 1 myocardial infarction, type 2 myocardial infarction is considered to be caused by an imbalance between demand and supply of oxygen in the myocardium. However, no specific criteria for type 2 myocardial infarction have been established.

Methods

We prospectively studied unselected hospital patients who had cardiac troponin I measured on clinical indication. The diagnosis and classification of myocardial infarction were established, and the frequency and features of type 2 myocardial infarction were investigated by use of novel developed criteria.

Results

From January 2010 to January 2011, a total of 7230 consecutive patients who had cardiac troponin I measured were evaluated, and 4499 patients qualified for inclusion. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction was established in 553 patients, of whom 386 (72%) had a type 1 myocardial infarction and 144 (26%) had a type 2 myocardial infarction. Patients in the group with type 2 myocardial infarction were older and more likely to be female, and had more comorbidities. The proportion of patients without significant coronary artery disease was higher in those with type 2 myocardial infarction (45%) than in those with type 1 myocardial infarction (12%) (P < .001). Tachyarrhythmias, anemia, and respiratory failure were the most prevalent mechanisms causing type 2 myocardial infarction.

Conclusions

In a cohort of patients with myocardial infarction who were admitted consecutively through 1 year, the category of type 2 myocardial infarction comprised one fourth when diagnosed by the use of newly developed criteria. Approximately half of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction had no significant coronary artery disease.

Section snippets

Study Design and Population

The study comprises patients consecutively admitted to a 1000-bed university hospital, which serves as a tertiary referral center for a region with 1.2 million inhabitants and as a local hospital for a catchment area of 300,000 residents. The data is a part of the DEF-AMI Study (Consequences of the universal 2007 DEFinition of Acute Myocardial Infarction studied in a Danish consecutive hospital population). All admitted patients who had cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measured were traced through

Results

cTnI was measured in 7230 hospitalized patients admitted between January 6, 2010, and January 5, 2011. Approximately one third of patients did not meet the inclusion criteria. Thus, 4499 patients were enrolled, and of these 1961 had cTnI elevation above the 99th percentile upper reference limit. Figure 1 shows that 553 patients (12.3%) had myocardial infarction.

Discussion

In this study, 4499 consecutive hospitalized patients with a suspected acute myocardial infarction were evaluated according to the principles of the universal definition and with particular emphasis on novel clinical standard criteria for the classification of type 2 myocardial infarction. Thus, 553 patients had acute myocardial infarction, of whom 26% were classified as having type 2 myocardial infarction. Approximately half of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction did not have

Conclusions

This prospective study on the classification and features of patients with myocardial infarction defined according to the universal definition demonstrates that 26% of these patients had type 2 myocardial infarction when novel developed clinical criteria were used. Patients with type 2 myocardial infarction generally had more severe clinical characteristics than patients with type 1 myocardial infarction. Approximately half of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction had no significant

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jens Lauritsen, MD, PhD, for taking care of the database.

References (26)

  • K. Dickstein et al.

    ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart

    Eur Heart J

    (2008)
  • M.S. Nieminen et al.

    Definition and epidemiology of acute heart failure syndromes

    Am J Cardiol

    (2005)
  • K. Thygesen et al.

    Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care

    Eur Heart J

    (2010)
  • Cited by (257)

    • Type 2 myocardial infarction

      2023, Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angeiologie
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: This study has been financially supported by the Danish Heart Association, Odense University Hospital, Denmark and by the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Faculty of Health Sciences.

    Conflict of Interest: None.

    Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.

    View full text