This study sought to define the additional effective radiation dose, procedural time, and contrast medium needed to obtain fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements after a diagnostic coronary angiogram.
Background
The FFR measurements performed at the end of a diagnostic angiogram allow the obtaining of functional information that complements the anatomic findings.
Methods
In 200 patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years) undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography, FFR was measured in at least 1 intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Hyperemia was achieved by intracoronary (n = 180) or intravenous (n = 20) adenosine. The radiation dose (mSv), procedural time (min), and contrast medium (ml) needed for diagnostic angiography and FFR were recorded.
Results
A total of 296 stenoses (1.5 ± 0.7 stenoses per patient) were assessed. The additional mean radiation dose, procedural time, and contrast medium needed to obtain FFR expressed as a percentage of the entire procedure were 30 ± 16% (median 4 mSv, range 2.4 to 6.7 mSv), 26 ± 13% (median 9 min, range 7 to 13 min), and 31 ± 16% (median 50 ml, range 30 to 90 ml), respectively. The radiation dose and contrast medium during FFR were similar after intravenous and intracoronary adenosine, though the procedural time was slightly longer with intravenous adenosine (median 11 min, range 10 to 17 min, p = 0.04) than with intracoronary adenosine (median 9 min, range 7 to 13 min). When FFR was measured in 3 or more lesions, radiation dose, procedural time, and contrast medium increased.
Conclusions
The additional radiation dose, procedural time, and contrast medium to obtain FFR measurement are low as compared to other cardiovascular imaging modalities. Therefore, the combination of diagnostic angiography and FFR measurements is warranted to provide simultaneously anatomic and functional information in patients with coronary artery disease.
Key Words
contrast medium
coronary angiography
fractional flow reserve
radiation
Abbreviations and Acronyms
FFR
fractional flow reserve
PCI
percutaneous coronary intervention
Cited by (0)
Supported by the Meijer Lavino Foundation for Cardiac Research. Dr. Ntalianis was supported by a grant from the Hellenic Cardiology Foundation. All other authors report that they have no relationships to disclose.